UTEP · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-31 15:30 · Fargodome
North Dakota State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
NDSU pass rush4.9% 8276th8.2% 18279thfaces UTEP21.1% 71137th13.0% ~4.3 sacks
UTEP pass rush1.2% 83133rd6.0% 183124thfaces NDSU2.8% 7223rd2.0% ~0.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UTEP with the ball

UTEP offence vs NDSU defenceUTEP offenceNDSU defencerank gap
points added per play-0.179138th-0.1565th-133
success rate0.367124th0.39268th-56
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.092127th1.0249th-118
rush: points added per play-0.197136th-0.2317th-129
rush: success rate0.357128th0.39867th-61
rush: explosiveness0.86795th0.70514th-81
pass: points added per play-0.037131st-0.03023rd-108
pass: success rate0.40297th0.39067th-30
pass: explosiveness1.371118th1.43840th-78
standard downs: success rate0.442115th0.488100th-15
passing downs: success rate0.200135th0.1844th-131
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.516133rd2.64651st-82
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.240131st0.18048th-83
short-yardage conversion rate0.500135th0.71468th-67
points per trip inside the 401.700136th1.7224th-132
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.217137th0.183101st-36
havoc allowed by the front seven0.173137th0.10477th-60
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04448th0.079112th+64
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.800100th——

NDSU with the ball

NDSU offence vs UTEP defenceNDSU offenceUTEP defencerank gap
points added per play0.15770th0.252130th+60
success rate0.400107th0.472131st+24
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.41415th1.20963rd+48
rush: points added per play0.04099th0.136112th+13
rush: success rate0.349131st0.439104th-27
rush: explosiveness1.08125th0.92271st+46
pass: points added per play0.37738th0.512137th+99
pass: success rate0.48538th0.528138th+100
pass: explosiveness1.79420th1.57178th+58
standard downs: success rate0.456103rd0.508116th+13
passing downs: success rate0.275101st0.369129th+28
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.826107th2.96991st-16
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19194th0.223105th+11
short-yardage conversion rate0.69297th0.66752nd-45
points per trip inside the 404.08360th4.500128th+68
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11532nd0.12617th-15
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06928th0.09459th+31
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04654th0.0314th-50
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.40072nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.