Wyoming · away
at
Final WYO 10 – 24 CMU
Saturday 2026-09-19 13:00 · Kelly/Shorts Stadium
Central Michigan · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
CMU pass rush4.3% 9385th5.7% 193130thfaces WYO5.3% 7672nd4.8% ~1.6 sacks
WYO pass rush2.3% 87121st7.1% 198105thfaces CMU9.3% 54122nd5.8% ~1.9 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

WYO with the ball

WYO offence vs CMU defenceWYO offenceCMU defencerank gap
points added per play0.15671st0.166114th+43
success rate0.46152nd0.473132nd+80
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.088128th1.11829th-99
rush: points added per play0.14861st0.118104th+43
rush: success rate0.46555th0.496133rd+78
rush: explosiveness0.795116th0.86243rd-73
pass: points added per play0.16191st0.15375th-16
pass: success rate0.44070th0.434102nd+32
pass: explosiveness1.330124th1.32917th-107
standard downs: success rate0.50358th0.522126th+68
passing downs: success rate0.36538th0.366126th+88
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.55615th3.534137th+122
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14039th0.13514th-25
short-yardage conversion rate1.0002nd0.933136th+134
points per trip inside the 402.958122nd3.39370th-52
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15486th0.14442nd-44
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09179th0.06814th-65
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06291st0.076107th+16
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.10078th——

CMU with the ball

CMU offence vs WYO defenceCMU offenceWYO defencerank gap
points added per play0.000123rd0.12395th-28
success rate0.351129th0.443109th-20
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.19687th1.09123rd-64
rush: points added per play0.13568th0.133110th+42
rush: success rate0.401102nd0.462115th+13
rush: explosiveness1.10722nd0.85041st+19
pass: points added per play-0.180137th0.19885th-52
pass: success rate0.263138th0.42595th-43
pass: explosiveness1.423107th1.44748th-59
standard downs: success rate0.395131st0.503114th-17
passing downs: success rate0.254112th0.28880th-32
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.18163rd3.263119th+56
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12922nd0.14521st-1
short-yardage conversion rate0.82625th0.923134th+109
points per trip inside the 403.000119th2.95745th-74
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16294th0.13026th-68
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09687th0.07633rd-54
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06699th0.05346th-53
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.40051st——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.