Tulsa · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-28 · time TBA · Alamodome
UTSA · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The units, side by side

TLSAUTSAbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence3675Offence: points per play — defence8245Offence: success rate — offence2768Offence: success rate — defence5527Offence: explosiveness — offence1810Offence: explosiveness — defence9374Run game — offence7782Run game — defence8310Pass game — offence1259Pass game — defence6659Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence7046Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence5111Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence5053Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence6885

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsTLSA by 33UTSA by 47

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). UTSA wins about 67% of the time at a number like ours.

TLSA

Games4
Plays per game64.2
Drives per game11.5
SP+-3.4 (83rd, offence 101st, defence 60th)
Returning production41% (pass 69%, rush 11%, receiving 42%)

UTSA

Games4
Plays per game63.2
Drives per game11.8
SP+-1.0 (73rd, offence 44th, defence 99th)
Returning production67% (pass 93%, rush 36%, receiving 61%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceTLSAUTSA
pass rate, all downs48%72nd51%48th
pass rate, standard downs46%37th44%51st
pass rate, 1st down42%74th48%33rd
no-huddle share67%64th84%37th
pass rate, passing downs51%126th67%53rd
pass rate, red zone44%38th35%87th
seconds per play (own drives)26.8105th27.397th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

TLSA offence

TLSA offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.11725788 of 138
success rate0.405257101 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.142257113 of 138
rush: points added per play0.22725732 of 138
rush: success rate0.44725771 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.03525742 of 138
pass: points added per play0.011257121 of 138
pass: success rate0.361257122 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.344257122 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.53225739 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.151257138 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.29525742 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12125717 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.9292575 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.000257120 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14025769 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07025733 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070257111 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.50025769 of 138

UTSA offence

UTSA offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.26825335 of 138
success rate0.47425345 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.111253124 of 138
rush: points added per play0.24825325 of 138
rush: success rate0.5412539 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.834253106 of 138
pass: points added per play0.29425357 of 138
pass: success rate0.41725387 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.45925397 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.56525314 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.263253109 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07525375 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17225379 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.85025316 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.54225391 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13725366 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07125335 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.067253105 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.400253104 of 138

TLSA defence

TLSA defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.07030625 of 138
success rate0.38630663 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.03530611 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.11830624 of 138
rush: success rate0.41530681 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.6093069 of 138
pass: points added per play0.06630647 of 138
pass: success rate0.36730644 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.44330645 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.42830652 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.30530693 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.83830668 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.19230666 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.61930631 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.30430613 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14730645 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.08230642 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.06530685 of 138
opponent average starting field position73.900306106 of 138

UTSA defence

UTSA defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.07732477 of 138
success rate0.432324101 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.13532436 of 138
rush: points added per play0.187324124 of 138
rush: success rate0.460324114 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.91732470 of 138
pass: points added per play0.08432457 of 138
pass: success rate0.42332494 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.38032426 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.47332488 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.340324114 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.280324123 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.12432410 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.65032443 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.71432493 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12832421 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.06732412 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.06132467 of 138
opponent average starting field position72.20032474 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs