Tulsa · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-28 · time TBA · Alamodome
UTSA · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UTSA pass rush1.8% 111128th5.9% 236126thfaces TLSA6.4% 9489th4.1% ~1.3 sacks
TLSA pass rush5.5% 12759th8.0% 22684thfaces UTSA2.0% 9811th3.8% ~1.2 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TLSA with the ball

TLSA offence vs UTSA defenceTLSA offenceUTSA defencerank gap
points added per play0.11788th0.07777th-11
success rate0.405101st0.432101st0
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.142113th1.13536th-77
rush: points added per play0.22732nd0.187124th+92
rush: success rate0.44771st0.460114th+43
rush: explosiveness1.03542nd0.91770th+28
pass: points added per play0.011121st0.08457th-64
pass: success rate0.361122nd0.42394th-28
pass: explosiveness1.344122nd1.38026th-96
standard downs: success rate0.53239th0.47388th+49
passing downs: success rate0.151138th0.340114th-24
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.29542nd3.280123rd+81
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12117th0.12410th-7
short-yardage conversion rate0.9295th0.65043rd+38
points per trip inside the 403.000120th3.71493rd-27
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14069th0.12821st-48
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07033rd0.06712th-21
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070111th0.06167th-44
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.50069th——

UTSA with the ball

UTSA offence vs TLSA defenceUTSA offenceTLSA defencerank gap
points added per play0.26835th-0.07025th-10
success rate0.47445th0.38663rd+18
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.111124th1.03511th-113
rush: points added per play0.24825th-0.11824th-1
rush: success rate0.5419th0.41581st+72
rush: explosiveness0.834106th0.6099th-97
pass: points added per play0.29457th0.06647th-10
pass: success rate0.41787th0.36744th-43
pass: explosiveness1.45997th1.44345th-52
standard downs: success rate0.56514th0.42852nd+38
passing downs: success rate0.263109th0.30593rd-16
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07575th2.83868th-7
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17279th0.19266th-13
short-yardage conversion rate0.85016th0.61931st+15
points per trip inside the 403.54291st2.30413th-78
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13766th0.14745th-21
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07135th0.08242nd+7
havoc allowed by the secondary0.067105th0.06585th-20
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.400104th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.