Tulane · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 · time TBA · Rice Stadium
Rice · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
RICE pass rush1.1% 88136th7.8% 19391stfaces TULN8.6% 116118th4.9% ~1.6 sacks
TULN pass rush4.1% 12289th7.3% 275100thfaces RICE6.0% 5088th5.1% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TULN with the ball

TULN offence vs RICE defenceTULN offenceRICE defencerank gap
points added per play0.10392nd0.13798th+6
success rate0.343131st0.42997th-34
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.5133rd1.28992nd+89
rush: points added per play0.16151st0.152117th+66
rush: success rate0.379118th0.42688th-30
rush: explosiveness1.3461st1.141126th+125
pass: points added per play0.020120th0.15074th-46
pass: success rate0.304134th0.442105th-29
pass: explosiveness1.70334th1.49759th+25
standard downs: success rate0.408128th0.489101st-27
passing downs: success rate0.237122nd0.31097th-25
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.573129th2.76661st-68
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.218120th0.18452nd-68
short-yardage conversion rate0.75072nd0.64740th-32
points per trip inside the 402.474132nd4.280122nd-10
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.200133rd0.14644th-89
havoc allowed by the front seven0.135133rd0.10786th-47
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06598th0.03814th-84
average starting field position (yards from own goal)75.1006th——

RICE with the ball

RICE offence vs TULN defenceRICE offenceTULN defencerank gap
points added per play0.069102nd0.171115th+13
success rate0.44761st0.39672nd+11
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.118121st1.30697th-24
rush: points added per play0.12770th0.112101st+31
rush: success rate0.48933rd0.37048th+15
rush: explosiveness0.98662nd1.074112th+50
pass: points added per play-0.059133rd0.300110th-23
pass: success rate0.333130th0.443107th-23
pass: explosiveness1.64847th1.54669th+22
standard downs: success rate0.52741st0.44162nd+21
passing downs: success rate0.239120th0.317104th-16
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.35333rd3.086106th+73
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13228th0.16233rd+5
short-yardage conversion rate0.80039th0.76997th+58
points per trip inside the 403.83374th3.30865th-9
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13764th0.1106th-58
havoc allowed by the front seven0.110111th0.06711th-100
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0279th0.04224th+15
average starting field position (yards from own goal)76.4002nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.