The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| UTSA pass rush | 1.8% 111128th | 5.9% 236126th | faces UNT | 1.7% 1168th | 1.8% ~0.6 sacks |
| UNT pass rush | 4.1% 7388th | 5.9% 185125th | faces UTSA | 2.0% 9811th | 3.1% ~1.0 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
UNT with the ball
| UNT offence vs UTSA defence | UNT offence | UTSA defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.31917th | 0.07777th | +60 |
| success rate | 0.50520th | 0.432101st | +81 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.28048th | 1.13536th | -12 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.18841st | 0.187124th | +83 |
| rush: success rate | 0.44673rd | 0.460114th | +41 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.05833rd | 0.91770th | +37 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.46721st | 0.08457th | +36 |
| pass: success rate | 0.5728th | 0.42394th | +86 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.46194th | 1.38026th | -68 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.55820th | 0.47388th | +68 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.37628th | 0.340114th | +86 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.27146th | 3.280123rd | +77 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16564th | 0.12410th | -54 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.75069th | 0.65043rd | -26 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.41938th | 3.71493rd | +55 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.11328th | 0.12821st | -7 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.06929th | 0.06712th | -17 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.04552nd | 0.06167th | +15 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 70.10077th | — | — |
UTSA with the ball
| UTSA offence vs UNT defence | UTSA offence | UNT defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.26835th | 0.11992nd | +57 |
| success rate | 0.47445th | 0.445113th | +68 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.111124th | 1.22669th | -55 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.24825th | -0.04340th | +15 |
| rush: success rate | 0.5419th | 0.41277th | +68 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.834106th | 0.72419th | -87 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.29457th | 0.453130th | +73 |
| pass: success rate | 0.41787th | 0.505131st | +44 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.45997th | 1.846129th | +32 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.56514th | 0.48193rd | +79 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.263109th | 0.352122nd | +13 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.07575th | 2.48329th | -46 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.17279th | 0.19674th | -5 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.85016th | 0.70461st | +45 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.54291st | 3.875107th | +16 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.13766th | 0.15051st | -15 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.07135th | 0.10682nd | +47 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.067105th | 0.04325th | -80 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 68.400104th | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.