East Carolina · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 · time TBA · Jerry Richardson Stadium
Charlotte · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
CLT pass rush3.7% 10994th11.5% 20921stfaces ECU7.3% 8299th5.5% ~1.8 sacks
ECU pass rush3.7% 8193rd12.0% 20919thfaces CLT3.2% 9334th3.5% ~1.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ECU with the ball

ECU offence vs CLT defenceECU offenceCLT defencerank gap
points added per play0.056106th0.165113th+7
success rate0.401105th0.472129th+24
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.166100th1.18150th-50
rush: points added per play-0.067124th0.09794th-30
rush: success rate0.368121st0.43394th-27
rush: explosiveness0.836105th1.102119th+14
pass: points added per play0.21076th0.343120th+44
pass: success rate0.42482nd0.520137th+55
pass: explosiveness1.49785th1.29412th-73
standard downs: success rate0.49171st0.48295th+24
passing downs: success rate0.200134th0.449138th+4
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.431136th2.79363rd-73
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19798th0.247120th+22
short-yardage conversion rate0.72781st0.800107th+26
points per trip inside the 403.238110th4.037113th+3
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.182124th0.13736th-88
havoc allowed by the front seven0.116120th0.10680th-40
havoc allowed by the secondary0.066100th0.0325th-95
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.40025th——

CLT with the ball

CLT offence vs ECU defenceCLT offenceECU defencerank gap
points added per play-0.095134th-0.01842nd-92
success rate0.362126th0.35435th-91
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.060132nd1.313101st-31
rush: points added per play-0.155135th0.02467th-68
rush: success rate0.365123rd0.37047th-76
rush: explosiveness0.760125th1.183131st+6
pass: points added per play0.024118th-0.00231st-87
pass: success rate0.376112th0.34525th-87
pass: explosiveness1.288128th1.54065th-63
standard downs: success rate0.444112th0.37114th-98
passing downs: success rate0.205133rd0.327109th-24
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.384137th2.25211th-126
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.279137th0.291134th-3
short-yardage conversion rate0.571123rd0.58320th-103
points per trip inside the 402.312133rd2.84637th-96
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.173114th0.194113th-1
havoc allowed by the front seven0.103103rd0.160131st+28
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070110th0.0359th-101
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.90017th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.