Rice · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-24 · time TBA · FAU Stadium
Florida Atlantic · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
FAU pass rush4.8% 12677th8.6% 25573rdfaces RICE6.0% 5088th5.4% ~1.8 sacks
RICE pass rush1.1% 88136th7.8% 19391stfaces FAU4.1% 17152nd2.6% ~0.9 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

RICE with the ball

RICE offence vs FAU defenceRICE offenceFAU defencerank gap
points added per play0.069102nd0.209122nd+20
success rate0.44761st0.40578th+17
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.118121st1.543136th+15
rush: points added per play0.12770th0.171120th+50
rush: success rate0.48933rd0.38958th+25
rush: explosiveness0.98662nd1.172130th+68
pass: points added per play-0.059133rd0.288109th-24
pass: success rate0.333130th0.42797th-33
pass: explosiveness1.64847th1.875132nd+85
standard downs: success rate0.52741st0.46381st+40
passing downs: success rate0.239120th0.28676th-44
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.35333rd2.80564th+31
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13228th0.19162nd+34
short-yardage conversion rate0.80039th0.857124th+85
points per trip inside the 403.83374th4.227120th+46
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13764th0.15862nd-2
havoc allowed by the front seven0.110111th0.08952nd-59
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0279th0.06993rd+84
average starting field position (yards from own goal)76.4002nd——

FAU with the ball

FAU offence vs RICE defenceFAU offenceRICE defencerank gap
points added per play0.14274th0.13798th+24
success rate0.43674th0.42997th+23
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.151107th1.28992nd-15
rush: points added per play0.05591st0.152117th+26
rush: success rate0.387113th0.42688th-25
rush: explosiveness0.97666th1.141126th+60
pass: points added per play0.23073rd0.15074th+1
pass: success rate0.48242nd0.442105th+63
pass: explosiveness1.287129th1.49759th-70
standard downs: success rate0.46694th0.489101st+7
passing downs: success rate0.36536th0.31097th+61
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.746117th2.76661st-56
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16766th0.18452nd-14
short-yardage conversion rate0.79342nd0.64740th-2
points per trip inside the 403.96268th4.280122nd+54
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14574th0.14644th-30
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08561st0.10786th+25
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06186th0.03814th-72
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.60090th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.