Charlotte · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-17 · time TBA · Lincoln Financial Field
Temple · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The units, side by side

CLTTEMbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence367Offence: points per play — defence1811Offence: success rate — offence944Offence: success rate — defence712Offence: explosiveness — offence471Offence: explosiveness — defence6458Run game — offence284Run game — defence3215Pass game — offence1543Pass game — defence1318Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence175Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence5548Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence1896Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence7497

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsCLT by 30TEM by 50

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). TEM wins about 73% of the time at a number like ours.

CLT

Games4
Plays per game60.8
Drives per game11.5
SP+-27.3 (137th, offence 137th, defence 137th)
Returning production41% (pass 113%, rush 27%, receiving 16%)

TEM

Games4
Plays per game61.5
Drives per game9.8
SP+-6.1 (92nd, offence 67th, defence 112th)
Returning production37% (pass 0%, rush 23%, receiving 69%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceCLTTEM
pass rate, all downs57%14th36%131st
pass rate, standard downs50%12th31%128th
pass rate, 1st down52%18th29%130th
no-huddle share35%96th64%67th
pass rate, passing downs72%29th52%124th
pass rate, red zone49%23rd33%94th
seconds per play (own drives)29.853rd30.144th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

CLT offence

CLT offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.095243134 of 138
success rate0.362243126 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.060243132 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.155243135 of 138
rush: success rate0.365243123 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.760243125 of 138
pass: points added per play0.024243118 of 138
pass: success rate0.376243112 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.288243128 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.444243112 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.205243133 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.384243137 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.279243137 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.571243123 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.312243133 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.173243114 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.103243103 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070243110 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.90024317 of 138

TEM offence

TEM offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.23724646 of 138
success rate0.43524678 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30124641 of 138
rush: points added per play0.25624623 of 138
rush: success rate0.46124660 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.06024632 of 138
pass: points added per play0.20524679 of 138
pass: success rate0.384246108 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.83424615 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.47524689 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.33324656 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.32824635 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16924674 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.72724683 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.381246103 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0892467 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.04924611 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04124636 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10024616 of 138

CLT defence

CLT defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.165284113 of 138
success rate0.472284129 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.18128450 of 138
rush: points added per play0.09728494 of 138
rush: success rate0.43328494 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.102284119 of 138
pass: points added per play0.343284120 of 138
pass: success rate0.520284137 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.29428412 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.48228495 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.449284138 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.79328463 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.247284120 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.800284107 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.037284113 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13728436 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.10628480 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.0322845 of 138
opponent average starting field position66.3002847 of 138

TEM defence

TEM defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.209267123 of 138
success rate0.457267121 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20226759 of 138
rush: points added per play0.155267118 of 138
rush: success rate0.455267111 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.88426758 of 138
pass: points added per play0.306267113 of 138
pass: success rate0.474267121 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.57626780 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.497267111 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.347267120 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.88326772 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.1102674 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.76926796 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.58626783 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.1092675 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.0522672 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05626759 of 138
opponent average starting field position72.40026778 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs