Charlotte · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-17 · time TBA · Lincoln Financial Field
Temple · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TEM pass rush1.2% 84134th4.0% 202138thfaces CLT3.2% 9334th2.2% ~0.7 sacks
CLT pass rush3.7% 10994th11.5% 20921stfaces TEM4.4% 6858th4.0% ~1.3 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

CLT with the ball

CLT offence vs TEM defenceCLT offenceTEM defencerank gap
points added per play-0.095134th0.209123rd-11
success rate0.362126th0.457121st-5
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.060132nd1.20259th-73
rush: points added per play-0.155135th0.155118th-17
rush: success rate0.365123rd0.455111th-12
rush: explosiveness0.760125th0.88458th-67
pass: points added per play0.024118th0.306113th-5
pass: success rate0.376112th0.474121st+9
pass: explosiveness1.288128th1.57680th-48
standard downs: success rate0.444112th0.497111th-1
passing downs: success rate0.205133rd0.347120th-13
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.384137th2.88372nd-65
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.279137th0.1104th-133
short-yardage conversion rate0.571123rd0.76996th-27
points per trip inside the 402.312133rd3.58683rd-50
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.173114th0.1095th-109
havoc allowed by the front seven0.103103rd0.0522nd-101
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070110th0.05659th-51
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.90017th——

TEM with the ball

TEM offence vs CLT defenceTEM offenceCLT defencerank gap
points added per play0.23746th0.165113th+67
success rate0.43578th0.472129th+51
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30141st1.18150th+9
rush: points added per play0.25623rd0.09794th+71
rush: success rate0.46160th0.43394th+34
rush: explosiveness1.06032nd1.102119th+87
pass: points added per play0.20579th0.343120th+41
pass: success rate0.384108th0.520137th+29
pass: explosiveness1.83415th1.29412th-3
standard downs: success rate0.47589th0.48295th+6
passing downs: success rate0.33356th0.449138th+82
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.32835th2.79363rd+28
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16974th0.247120th+46
short-yardage conversion rate0.72783rd0.800107th+24
points per trip inside the 403.381103rd4.037113th+10
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0897th0.13736th+29
havoc allowed by the front seven0.04911th0.10680th+69
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04136th0.0325th-31
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10016th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.