The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| TULN pass rush | 4.1% 12289th | 7.3% 275100th | faces MEM | 5.7% 7082nd | 4.9% ~1.6 sacks |
| MEM pass rush | 8.6% 10521st | 10.4% 21235th | faces TULN | 8.6% 116118th | 8.6% ~2.8 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
MEM with the ball
| MEM offence vs TULN defence | MEM offence | TULN defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.26236th | 0.171115th | +79 |
| success rate | 0.47246th | 0.39672nd | +26 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.37021st | 1.30697th | +76 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.18245th | 0.112101st | +56 |
| rush: success rate | 0.45864th | 0.37048th | -16 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.00853rd | 1.074112th | +59 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.54512th | 0.300110th | +98 |
| pass: success rate | 0.51424th | 0.443107th | +83 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.82816th | 1.54669th | +53 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.51646th | 0.44162nd | +16 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.35346th | 0.317104th | +58 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.46424th | 3.086106th | +82 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.14845th | 0.16233rd | -12 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.75067th | 0.76997th | +30 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.60932nd | 3.30865th | +33 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.12642nd | 0.1106th | -36 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.06725th | 0.06711th | -14 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.05982nd | 0.04224th | -58 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 76.9001st | — | — |
TULN with the ball
| TULN offence vs MEM defence | TULN offence | MEM defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.10392nd | 0.180117th | +25 |
| success rate | 0.343131st | 0.41889th | -42 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.5133rd | 1.400124th | +121 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.16151st | 0.290134th | +83 |
| rush: success rate | 0.379118th | 0.463117th | -1 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.3461st | 1.104120th | +119 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.020120th | 0.11564th | -56 |
| pass: success rate | 0.304134th | 0.38863rd | -71 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.70334th | 1.709111th | +77 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.408128th | 0.503113th | -15 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.237122nd | 0.26048th | -74 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.573129th | 3.389127th | -2 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.218120th | 0.12711th | -109 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.75072nd | 0.842121st | +49 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 2.474132nd | 3.60085th | -47 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.200133rd | 0.14947th | -86 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.135133rd | 0.09158th | -75 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.06598th | 0.05860th | -38 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 75.1006th | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.