East Carolina · away
at
—
Thursday 2026-10-15 19:30 · Protective Stadium
UAB · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UAB pass rush10.4% 779th7.8% 24389thfaces ECU7.3% 8299th8.9% ~2.9 sacks
ECU pass rush3.7% 8193rd12.0% 20919thfaces UAB10.6% 104132nd7.1% ~2.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ECU with the ball

ECU offence vs UAB defenceECU offenceUAB defencerank gap
points added per play0.056106th0.05373rd-33
success rate0.401105th0.450116th+11
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.166100th1.04414th-86
rush: points added per play-0.067124th0.09393rd-31
rush: success rate0.368121st0.473125th+4
rush: explosiveness0.836105th0.94278th-27
pass: points added per play0.21076th-0.01129th-47
pass: success rate0.42482nd0.40372nd-10
pass: explosiveness1.49785th1.2757th-78
standard downs: success rate0.49171st0.531130th+59
passing downs: success rate0.200134th0.25042nd-92
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.431136th3.430132nd-4
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19798th0.1249th-89
short-yardage conversion rate0.72781st0.70462nd-19
points per trip inside the 403.238110th3.870106th-4
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.182124th0.15761st-63
havoc allowed by the front seven0.116120th0.120109th-11
havoc allowed by the secondary0.066100th0.03610th-90
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.40025th——

UAB with the ball

UAB offence vs ECU defenceUAB offenceECU defencerank gap
points added per play0.050108th-0.01842nd-66
success rate0.42388th0.35435th-53
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.18592nd1.313101st+9
rush: points added per play0.13569th0.02467th-2
rush: success rate0.43782nd0.37047th-35
rush: explosiveness0.99458th1.183131st+73
pass: points added per play-0.009127th-0.00231st-96
pass: success rate0.41391st0.34525th-66
pass: explosiveness1.45598th1.54065th-33
standard downs: success rate0.441117th0.37114th-103
passing downs: success rate0.38025th0.327109th+84
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13767th2.25211th-56
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15958th0.291134th+76
short-yardage conversion rate0.73975th0.58320th-55
points per trip inside the 402.889126th2.84637th-89
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15892nd0.194113th+21
havoc allowed by the front seven0.106108th0.160131st+23
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05370th0.0359th-61
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.60091st——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.