UTSA · away
at
UTSA -12.5
Saturday 2026-10-03 19:00 · Rice Stadium
Rice · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
RICE pass rush1.1% 88136th7.8% 19391stfaces UTSA2.0% 9811th1.6% ~0.5 sacks
UTSA pass rush1.8% 111128th5.9% 236126thfaces RICE6.0% 5088th3.9% ~1.3 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UTSA with the ball

UTSA offence vs RICE defenceUTSA offenceRICE defencerank gap
points added per play0.26835th0.13798th+63
success rate0.47445th0.42997th+52
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.111124th1.28992nd-32
rush: points added per play0.24825th0.152117th+92
rush: success rate0.5419th0.42688th+79
rush: explosiveness0.834106th1.141126th+20
pass: points added per play0.29457th0.15074th+17
pass: success rate0.41787th0.442105th+18
pass: explosiveness1.45997th1.49759th-38
standard downs: success rate0.56514th0.489101st+87
passing downs: success rate0.263109th0.31097th-12
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07575th2.76661st-14
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17279th0.18452nd-27
short-yardage conversion rate0.85016th0.64740th+24
points per trip inside the 403.54291st4.280122nd+31
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13766th0.14644th-22
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07135th0.10786th+51
havoc allowed by the secondary0.067105th0.03814th-91
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.400104th——

RICE with the ball

RICE offence vs UTSA defenceRICE offenceUTSA defencerank gap
points added per play0.069102nd0.07777th-25
success rate0.44761st0.432101st+40
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.118121st1.13536th-85
rush: points added per play0.12770th0.187124th+54
rush: success rate0.48933rd0.460114th+81
rush: explosiveness0.98662nd0.91770th+8
pass: points added per play-0.059133rd0.08457th-76
pass: success rate0.333130th0.42394th-36
pass: explosiveness1.64847th1.38026th-21
standard downs: success rate0.52741st0.47388th+47
passing downs: success rate0.239120th0.340114th-6
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.35333rd3.280123rd+90
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13228th0.12410th-18
short-yardage conversion rate0.80039th0.65043rd+4
points per trip inside the 403.83374th3.71493rd+19
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13764th0.12821st-43
havoc allowed by the front seven0.110111th0.06712th-99
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0279th0.06167th+58
average starting field position (yards from own goal)76.4002nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.