The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| ULM pass rush | 2.9% 103109th | 6.8% 235112th | faces FAU | 4.1% 17152nd | 3.5% ~1.2 sacks |
| FAU pass rush | 4.8% 12677th | 8.6% 25573rd | faces ULM | 7.1% 8497th | 6.0% ~2.0 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
FAU with the ball
| FAU offence vs ULM defence | FAU offence | ULM defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.14274th | 0.308135th | +61 |
| success rate | 0.43674th | 0.508137th | +63 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.151107th | 1.21566th | -41 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.05591st | 0.314136th | +45 |
| rush: success rate | 0.387113th | 0.522138th | +25 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.97666th | 1.077115th | +49 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.23073rd | 0.339118th | +45 |
| pass: success rate | 0.48242nd | 0.500130th | +88 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.287129th | 1.41334th | -95 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.46694th | 0.536133rd | +39 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.36536th | 0.427136th | +100 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.746117th | 3.418130th | +13 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16766th | 0.16132nd | -34 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.79342nd | 0.778102nd | +60 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.96268th | 4.448125th | +57 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.14574th | 0.1158th | -66 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.08561st | 0.0648th | -53 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.06186th | 0.05142nd | -44 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 69.60090th | — | — |
ULM with the ball
| ULM offence vs FAU defence | ULM offence | FAU defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | -0.052130th | 0.209122nd | -8 |
| success rate | 0.402103rd | 0.40578th | -25 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.119119th | 1.543136th | +17 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.07088th | 0.171120th | +32 |
| rush: success rate | 0.43286th | 0.38958th | -28 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.87990th | 1.172130th | +40 |
| pass: points added per play | -0.082134th | 0.288109th | -25 |
| pass: success rate | 0.386106th | 0.42797th | -9 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.406111th | 1.875132nd | +21 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.455105th | 0.46381st | -24 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.275102nd | 0.28676th | -26 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.96891st | 2.80564th | -27 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.15252nd | 0.19162nd | +10 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.571125th | 0.857124th | -1 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 2.478131st | 4.227120th | -11 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.170110th | 0.15862nd | -48 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.10097th | 0.08952nd | -45 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.070112th | 0.06993rd | -19 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 72.90033rd | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.