Army · away
at
Final ARMY 21 – 17 TEM
Friday 2026-09-25 16:00 · Lincoln Financial Field
Temple · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TEM pass rush1.2% 84134th4.0% 202138thfaces ARMY——
ARMY pass rush2.0% 51124th5.6% 107131stfaces TEM4.4% 6858th3.2% ~1.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ARMY with the ball

ARMY offence vs TEM defenceARMY offenceTEM defencerank gap
points added per play0.36510th0.209123rd+113
success rate0.5504th0.457121st+117
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.029135th1.20259th-76
rush: points added per play0.3953rd0.155118th+115
rush: success rate0.5764th0.455111th+107
rush: explosiveness0.98861st0.88458th-3
pass: points added per play0.32052nd0.306113th+61
pass: success rate0.50029th0.474121st+92
pass: explosiveness1.201137th1.57680th-57
standard downs: success rate0.6104th0.497111th+107
passing downs: success rate0.28992nd0.347120th+28
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.8277th2.88372nd+65
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.0974th0.1104th0
short-yardage conversion rate0.8896th0.76996th+90
points per trip inside the 404.40939th3.58683rd+44
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0451st0.1095th+4
havoc allowed by the front seven0.0456th0.0522nd-4
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0001st0.05659th+58
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.60089th——

TEM with the ball

TEM offence vs ARMY defenceTEM offenceARMY defencerank gap
points added per play0.23746th0.189118th+72
success rate0.43578th0.438105th+27
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30141st1.24581st+40
rush: points added per play0.25623rd0.177122nd+99
rush: success rate0.46160th0.471122nd+62
rush: explosiveness1.06032nd0.97189th+57
pass: points added per play0.20579th0.21791st+12
pass: success rate0.384108th0.41379th-29
pass: explosiveness1.83415th1.59888th+73
standard downs: success rate0.47589th0.48799th+10
passing downs: success rate0.33356th0.327108th+52
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.32835th3.274121st+86
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16974th0.18858th-16
short-yardage conversion rate0.72783rd0.75082nd-1
points per trip inside the 403.381103rd2.83336th-67
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0897th0.13024th+17
havoc allowed by the front seven0.04911th0.06813th+2
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04136th0.06268th+32
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10016th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.