Tulsa · away
at
Final TLSA 23 – 17 SHSU
Saturday 2026-09-12 19:00 · Elliott T. Bowers Stadium
Sam Houston · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
SHSU pass rush7.4% 9430th11.4% 20222ndfaces TLSA6.4% 9489th6.9% ~2.3 sacks
TLSA pass rush5.5% 12759th8.0% 22684thfaces SHSU7.1% 12698th6.3% ~2.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TLSA with the ball

TLSA offence vs SHSU defenceTLSA offenceSHSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.11788th0.06574th-14
success rate0.405101st0.38866th-35
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.142113th1.25986th-27
rush: points added per play0.22732nd0.204128th+96
rush: success rate0.44771st0.43499th+28
rush: explosiveness1.03542nd1.157127th+85
pass: points added per play0.011121st-0.05817th-104
pass: success rate0.361122nd0.33017th-105
pass: explosiveness1.344122nd1.39630th-92
standard downs: success rate0.53239th0.44565th+26
passing downs: success rate0.151138th0.27866th-72
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.29542nd3.075104th+62
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12117th0.20380th+63
short-yardage conversion rate0.9295th0.73779th+74
points per trip inside the 403.000120th2.87540th-80
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14069th0.224132nd+63
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07033rd0.125114th+81
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070111th0.099132nd+21
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.50069th——

SHSU with the ball

SHSU offence vs TLSA defenceSHSU offenceTLSA defencerank gap
points added per play0.10293rd-0.07025th-68
success rate0.43971st0.38663rd-8
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.28346th1.03511th-35
rush: points added per play0.040100th-0.11824th-76
rush: success rate0.47445th0.41581st+36
rush: explosiveness0.824108th0.6099th-99
pass: points added per play0.20480th0.06647th-33
pass: success rate0.43473rd0.36744th-29
pass: explosiveness1.64249th1.44345th-4
standard downs: success rate0.47787th0.42852nd-35
passing downs: success rate0.35347th0.30593rd+46
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.799112th2.83868th-44
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.211115th0.19266th-49
short-yardage conversion rate0.611120th0.61931st-89
points per trip inside the 403.45895th2.30413th-82
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.175116th0.14745th-71
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111116th0.08242nd-74
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06496th0.06585th-11
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.10031st——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.