UConn · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-10 15:45 · Lincoln Financial Field
Temple · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TEM pass rush1.2% 84134th4.0% 202138thfaces CONN8.3% 84113th4.8% ~1.6 sacks
CONN pass rush2.4% 126119th8.4% 21577thfaces TEM4.4% 6858th3.4% ~1.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

CONN with the ball

CONN offence vs TEM defenceCONN offenceTEM defencerank gap
points added per play0.23150th0.209123rd+73
success rate0.43579th0.457121st+42
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.42113th1.20259th+46
rush: points added per play0.20738th0.155118th+80
rush: success rate0.46063rd0.455111th+48
rush: explosiveness1.02148th0.88458th+10
pass: points added per play0.36841st0.306113th+72
pass: success rate0.42680th0.474121st+41
pass: explosiveness1.9636th1.57680th+74
standard downs: success rate0.48083rd0.497111th+28
passing downs: success rate0.34152nd0.347120th+68
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.23951st2.88372nd+21
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16871st0.1104th-67
short-yardage conversion rate0.667107th0.76996th-11
points per trip inside the 404.62530th3.58683rd+53
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12745th0.1095th-40
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08873rd0.0522nd-71
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03828th0.05659th+31
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.90065th——

TEM with the ball

TEM offence vs CONN defenceTEM offenceCONN defencerank gap
points added per play0.23746th0.01961st+15
success rate0.43578th0.38664th-14
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30141st1.25585th+44
rush: points added per play0.25623rd-0.01454th+31
rush: success rate0.46160th0.38154th-6
rush: explosiveness1.06032nd0.87453rd+21
pass: points added per play0.20579th0.06648th-31
pass: success rate0.384108th0.39371st-37
pass: explosiveness1.83415th1.50260th+45
standard downs: success rate0.47589th0.44061st-28
passing downs: success rate0.33356th0.28374th+18
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.32835th2.64852nd+17
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16974th0.21291st+17
short-yardage conversion rate0.72783rd0.61129th-54
points per trip inside the 403.381103rd2.72030th-73
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0897th0.16979th+72
havoc allowed by the front seven0.04911th0.08345th+34
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04136th0.086124th+88
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10016th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.