Oregon State · away
at
Final ORST 33 – 7 UTEP
Saturday 2026-09-26 21:00 · Sun Bowl
UTEP · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UTEP pass rush1.2% 83133rd6.0% 183124thfaces ORST4.3% 14055th2.7% ~0.9 sacks
ORST pass rush12.6% 954th10.6% 20832ndfaces UTEP21.1% 71137th16.9% ~5.6 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ORST with the ball

ORST offence vs UTEP defenceORST offenceUTEP defencerank gap
points added per play0.25537th0.252130th+93
success rate0.42587th0.472131st+44
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.4556th1.20963rd+57
rush: points added per play0.037101st0.136112th+11
rush: success rate0.387115th0.439104th-11
rush: explosiveness0.795115th0.92271st-44
pass: points added per play0.36939th0.512137th+98
pass: success rate0.44963rd0.528138th+75
pass: explosiveness1.75425th1.57178th+53
standard downs: success rate0.48676th0.508116th+40
passing downs: success rate0.30478th0.369129th+51
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.19859th2.96991st+32
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.1089th0.223105th+96
short-yardage conversion rate0.77852nd0.66752nd0
points per trip inside the 404.59333rd4.500128th+95
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13252nd0.12617th-35
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05112th0.09459th+47
havoc allowed by the secondary0.081126th0.0314th-122
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.80011th——

UTEP with the ball

UTEP offence vs ORST defenceUTEP offenceORST defencerank gap
points added per play-0.179138th0.09282nd-56
success rate0.367124th0.41386th-38
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.092127th1.09326th-101
rush: points added per play-0.197136th0.02669th-67
rush: success rate0.357128th0.39763rd-65
rush: explosiveness0.86795th0.76424th-71
pass: points added per play-0.037131st0.17280th-51
pass: success rate0.40297th0.439104th+7
pass: explosiveness1.371118th1.39629th-89
standard downs: success rate0.442115th0.46986th-29
passing downs: success rate0.200135th0.30290th-45
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.516133rd3.042101st-32
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.240131st0.13515th-116
short-yardage conversion rate0.500135th0.76292nd-43
points per trip inside the 401.700136th3.30864th-72
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.217137th0.16777th-60
havoc allowed by the front seven0.173137th0.09766th-71
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04448th0.06994th+46
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.800100th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.