Rice · away
at
Final RICE 24 – 38 FRES
Saturday 2026-09-26 22:00 · Valley Children's Stadium
Fresno State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
FRES pass rush5.7% 12355th9.5% 26249thfaces RICE6.0% 5088th5.8% ~1.9 sacks
RICE pass rush1.1% 88136th7.8% 19391stfaces FRES2.7% 11121st1.9% ~0.6 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

RICE with the ball

RICE offence vs FRES defenceRICE offenceFRES defencerank gap
points added per play0.069102nd0.01055th-47
success rate0.44761st0.444110th+49
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.118121st1.12733rd-88
rush: points added per play0.12770th-0.02047th-23
rush: success rate0.48933rd0.438102nd+69
rush: explosiveness0.98662nd0.82131st-31
pass: points added per play-0.059133rd0.11463rd-70
pass: success rate0.333130th0.467118th-12
pass: explosiveness1.64847th1.49458th+11
standard downs: success rate0.52741st0.510119th+78
passing downs: success rate0.239120th0.27663rd-57
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.35333rd2.93287th+54
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13228th0.20886th+58
short-yardage conversion rate0.80039th0.65042nd+3
points per trip inside the 403.83374th2.90042nd-32
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13764th0.15659th-5
havoc allowed by the front seven0.110111th0.10070th-41
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0279th0.05656th+47
average starting field position (yards from own goal)76.4002nd——

FRES with the ball

FRES offence vs RICE defenceFRES offenceRICE defencerank gap
points added per play0.11589th0.13798th+9
success rate0.369123rd0.42997th-26
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.42811th1.28992nd+81
rush: points added per play0.025105th0.152117th+12
rush: success rate0.336134th0.42688th-46
rush: explosiveness1.2267th1.141126th+119
pass: points added per play0.36145th0.15074th+29
pass: success rate0.44566th0.442105th+39
pass: explosiveness1.60655th1.49759th+4
standard downs: success rate0.399130th0.489101st-29
passing downs: success rate0.30379th0.31097th+18
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.559131st2.76661st-70
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.266136th0.18452nd-84
short-yardage conversion rate0.500133rd0.64740th-93
points per trip inside the 403.64085th4.280122nd+37
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13355th0.14644th-11
havoc allowed by the front seven0.108109th0.10786th-23
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0247th0.03814th+7
average starting field position (yards from own goal)66.900120th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.