North Texas · away
at
Final UNT 35 – 49 TXST
Saturday 2026-09-19 12:00 · Bobcat Stadium (TX)
Texas State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TXST pass rush0.8% 134137th7.0% 228107thfaces UNT1.7% 1168th1.2% ~0.4 sacks
UNT pass rush4.1% 7388th5.9% 185125thfaces TXST1.3% 806th2.7% ~0.9 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UNT with the ball

UNT offence vs TXST defenceUNT offenceTXST defencerank gap
points added per play0.31917th0.14899th+82
success rate0.50520th0.461123rd+103
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.28048th1.22368th+20
rush: points added per play0.18841st-0.01851st+10
rush: success rate0.44673rd0.39868th-5
rush: explosiveness1.05833rd0.84840th+7
pass: points added per play0.46721st0.362122nd+101
pass: success rate0.5728th0.511133rd+125
pass: explosiveness1.46194th1.43337th-57
standard downs: success rate0.55820th0.519124th+104
passing downs: success rate0.37628th0.343117th+89
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.27146th2.50230th-16
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16564th0.250123rd+59
short-yardage conversion rate0.75069th0.59123rd-46
points per trip inside the 404.41938th4.321123rd+85
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11328th0.15966th+38
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06929th0.08139th+10
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04552nd0.078111th+59
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.10077th——

TXST with the ball

TXST offence vs UNT defenceTXST offenceUNT defencerank gap
points added per play0.30520th0.11992nd+72
success rate0.49528th0.445113th+85
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.32429th1.22669th+40
rush: points added per play0.15357th-0.04340th-17
rush: success rate0.46753rd0.41277th+24
rush: explosiveness0.97168th0.72419th-49
pass: points added per play0.6604th0.453130th+126
pass: success rate0.55910th0.505131st+121
pass: explosiveness1.85214th1.846129th+115
standard downs: success rate0.48480th0.48193rd+13
passing downs: success rate0.5302nd0.352122nd+120
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.26848th2.48329th-19
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13937th0.19674th+37
short-yardage conversion rate0.667105th0.70461st-44
points per trip inside the 403.214112th3.875107th-5
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11329th0.15051st+22
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07950th0.10682nd+32
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03419th0.04325th+6
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.60050th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.