Memphis · away
at
Final MEM 20 – 38 BOIS
Saturday 2026-09-12 18:00 · Albertsons Stadium
Boise State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
BOIS pass rush4.1% 9890th10.2% 16738thfaces MEM5.7% 7082nd4.9% ~1.6 sacks
MEM pass rush8.6% 10521st10.4% 21235thfaces BOIS3.6% 8341st6.1% ~2.0 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

MEM with the ball

MEM offence vs BOIS defenceMEM offenceBOIS defencerank gap
points added per play0.26236th0.01960th+24
success rate0.47246th0.35638th-8
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.37021st1.663138th+117
rush: points added per play0.18245th0.01763rd+18
rush: success rate0.45864th0.33027th-37
rush: explosiveness1.00853rd1.083116th+63
pass: points added per play0.54512th0.11462nd+50
pass: success rate0.51424th0.38157th+33
pass: explosiveness1.82816th2.024137th+121
standard downs: success rate0.51646th0.41541st-5
passing downs: success rate0.35346th0.26250th+4
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.46424th2.46927th+3
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14845th0.284133rd+88
short-yardage conversion rate0.75067th0.800106th+39
points per trip inside the 404.60932nd2.66726th-6
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12642nd0.192112th+70
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06725th0.11495th+70
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05982nd0.078109th+27
average starting field position (yards from own goal)76.9001st——

BOIS with the ball

BOIS offence vs MEM defenceBOIS offenceMEM defencerank gap
points added per play0.29523rd0.180117th+94
success rate0.50023rd0.41889th+66
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.153105th1.400124th+19
rush: points added per play0.24824th0.290134th+110
rush: success rate0.51815th0.463117th+102
rush: explosiveness0.94177th1.104120th+43
pass: points added per play0.33548th0.11564th+16
pass: success rate0.46155th0.38863rd+8
pass: explosiveness1.49087th1.709111th+24
standard downs: success rate0.53834th0.503113th+79
passing downs: success rate0.40016th0.26048th+32
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.50420th3.389127th+107
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14946th0.12711th-35
short-yardage conversion rate0.76259th0.842121st+62
points per trip inside the 404.28650th3.60085th+35
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0909th0.14947th+38
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05921st0.09158th+37
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03115th0.05860th+45
average starting field position (yards from own goal)75.0007th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.