Rice · away
at
Final RICE 0 – 52 ND
Saturday 2026-09-12 15:30 · Notre Dame Stadium
Notre Dame · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ND pass rush10.2% 10810th12.7% 21214thfaces RICE6.0% 5088th8.1% ~2.7 sacks
RICE pass rush1.1% 88136th7.8% 19391stfaces ND0.9% 1135th1.0% ~0.3 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

RICE with the ball

RICE offence vs ND defenceRICE offenceND defencerank gap
points added per play0.069102nd-0.11915th-87
success rate0.44761st0.34224th-37
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.118121st1.13837th-84
rush: points added per play0.12770th-0.2298th-62
rush: success rate0.48933rd0.30412th-21
rush: explosiveness0.98662nd0.81230th-32
pass: points added per play-0.059133rd-0.02126th-107
pass: success rate0.333130th0.37448th-82
pass: explosiveness1.64847th1.37825th-22
standard downs: success rate0.52741st0.39022nd-19
passing downs: success rate0.239120th0.25344th-76
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.35333rd2.32116th-17
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13228th0.223103rd+75
short-yardage conversion rate0.80039th0.73377th+38
points per trip inside the 403.83374th1.6252nd-72
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13764th0.240135th+71
havoc allowed by the front seven0.110111th0.169134th+23
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0279th0.07199th+90
average starting field position (yards from own goal)76.4002nd——

ND with the ball

ND offence vs RICE defenceND offenceRICE defencerank gap
points added per play0.33313th0.13798th+85
success rate0.51613th0.42997th+84
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.116122nd1.28992nd-30
rush: points added per play0.14265th0.152117th+52
rush: success rate0.48238th0.42688th+50
rush: explosiveness0.795114th1.141126th+12
pass: points added per play0.56311th0.15074th+63
pass: success rate0.55811th0.442105th+94
pass: explosiveness1.45996th1.49759th-37
standard downs: success rate0.5996th0.489101st+95
passing downs: success rate0.214132nd0.31097th-35
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.94393rd2.76661st-32
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15353rd0.18452nd-1
short-yardage conversion rate0.76262nd0.64740th-22
points per trip inside the 405.2866th4.280122nd+116
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.10116th0.14644th+28
havoc allowed by the front seven0.0353rd0.10786th+83
havoc allowed by the secondary0.066101st0.03814th-87
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.30044th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.