Rutgers · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-21 · time TBA · Beaver Stadium
Penn State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
PSU pass rush4.3% 11684th8.3% 22878thfaces RUTG7.4% 108100th5.9% ~1.9 sacks
RUTG pass rush3.5% 8695th7.6% 18593rdfaces PSU4.4% 11359th4.0% ~1.3 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

RUTG with the ball

RUTG offence vs PSU defenceRUTG offencePSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.13577th-0.10319th-58
success rate0.48237th0.31510th-27
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30140th1.17147th+7
rush: points added per play0.024106th0.04074th-32
rush: success rate0.48934th0.33931st-3
rush: explosiveness0.766123rd1.129125th+2
pass: points added per play0.33449th-0.1643rd-46
pass: success rate0.47745th0.2966th-39
pass: explosiveness1.86112th1.2074th-8
standard downs: success rate0.50852nd0.36511th-41
passing downs: success rate0.41812th0.22423rd+11
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13369th2.52933rd-36
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16161st0.229109th+48
short-yardage conversion rate0.70094th0.66750th-44
points per trip inside the 403.96367th3.63688th+21
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14676th0.195114th+38
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06222nd0.11294th+72
havoc allowed by the secondary0.084129th0.083120th-9
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.00099th——

PSU with the ball

PSU offence vs RUTG defencePSU offenceRUTG defencerank gap
points added per play0.22055th0.149101st+46
success rate0.41894th0.436103rd+9
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.29942nd1.20258th+16
rush: points added per play0.10278th0.117103rd+25
rush: success rate0.40999th0.464120th+21
rush: explosiveness0.92981st0.90065th-16
pass: points added per play0.39132nd0.307114th+82
pass: success rate0.43472nd0.41583rd+11
pass: explosiveness1.81317th1.58985th+68
standard downs: success rate0.47392nd0.497110th+18
passing downs: success rate0.270106th0.29787th-19
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.835105th3.00293rd-12
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13634th0.20077th+43
short-yardage conversion rate0.72782nd0.75086th+4
points per trip inside the 403.96766th3.65290th+24
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11633rd0.13737th+4
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05819th0.10073rd+54
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05879th0.03712th-67
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.800126th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.