Nebraska · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 · time TBA · SHI Stadium
Rutgers · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
RUTG pass rush3.5% 8695th7.6% 18593rdfaces NEB3.2% 9333rd3.4% ~1.1 sacks
NEB pass rush7.2% 8332nd9.5% 16953rdfaces RUTG7.4% 108100th7.3% ~2.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

NEB with the ball

NEB offence vs RUTG defenceNEB offenceRUTG defencerank gap
points added per play0.4146th0.149101st+95
success rate0.49825th0.436103rd+78
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.4398th1.20258th+50
rush: points added per play0.3445th0.117103rd+98
rush: success rate0.49429th0.464120th+91
rush: explosiveness1.2595th0.90065th+60
pass: points added per play0.49917th0.307114th+97
pass: success rate0.50031st0.41583rd+52
pass: explosiveness1.65845th1.58985th+40
standard downs: success rate0.51744th0.497110th+66
passing downs: success rate0.4494th0.29787th+83
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.40828th3.00293rd+65
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15251st0.20077th+26
short-yardage conversion rate0.72087th0.75086th-1
points per trip inside the 405.1929th3.65290th+81
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11023rd0.13737th+14
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07134th0.10073rd+39
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03932nd0.03712th-20
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.70087th——

RUTG with the ball

RUTG offence vs NEB defenceRUTG offenceNEB defencerank gap
points added per play0.13577th-0.01843rd-34
success rate0.48237th0.36646th+9
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30140th1.24178th+38
rush: points added per play0.024106th0.00260th-46
rush: success rate0.48934th0.35537th+3
rush: explosiveness0.766123rd1.050106th-17
pass: points added per play0.33449th-0.10712th-37
pass: success rate0.47745th0.34926th-19
pass: explosiveness1.86112th1.34220th+8
standard downs: success rate0.50852nd0.46482nd+30
passing downs: success rate0.41812th0.1907th-5
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13369th2.89875th+6
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16161st0.18251st-10
short-yardage conversion rate0.70094th0.800108th+14
points per trip inside the 403.96367th2.61124th-43
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14676th0.204121st+45
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06222nd0.136119th+97
havoc allowed by the secondary0.084129th0.06890th-39
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.00099th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.