UCLA · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-07 · time TBA · Huntington Bank Stadium
Minnesota · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The units, side by side

UCLAMINNbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence8142Offence: points per play — defence9248Offence: success rate — offence7966Offence: success rate — defence8963Offence: explosiveness — offence589Offence: explosiveness — defence2056Run game — offence9923Run game — defence8238Pass game — offence2654Pass game — defence9341Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence1003Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence8561Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence6248Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence244

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsUCLA by 44MINN by 36

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). UCLA wins about 59% of the time at a number like ours.

UCLA

Games4
Plays per game66.2
Drives per game13.0
SP+13.8 (24th, offence 16th, defence 40th)
Returning production57% (pass 55%, rush 86%, receiving 34%)

MINN

Games4
Plays per game66.5
Drives per game11.5
SP+6.5 (52nd, offence 62nd, defence 34th)
Returning production65% (pass 97%, rush 1000%, receiving 45%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceUCLAMINN
pass rate, all downs41%117th55%22nd
pass rate, standard downs34%118th49%15th
pass rate, 1st down37%107th54%8th
no-huddle share19%111th18%114th
pass rate, red zone30%108th66%3rd
pass rate, passing downs61%83rd73%27th
seconds per play (own drives)30.534th31.219th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

UCLA offence

UCLA offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.28726527 of 138
success rate0.49426530 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.25326558 of 138
rush: points added per play0.4072652 of 138
rush: success rate0.5732655 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.06426531 of 138
pass: points added per play0.124265103 of 138
pass: success rate0.394265101 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.66826540 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.55226526 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.34226550 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.9752651 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.0962653 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.84226520 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.34326545 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13226553 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05726518 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.075265118 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)63.700265134 of 138

MINN offence

MINN offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.12926681 of 138
success rate0.47026647 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.092266126 of 138
rush: points added per play0.023266107 of 138
rush: success rate0.47426644 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.747266126 of 138
pass: points added per play0.27326664 of 138
pass: success rate0.47926644 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.355266120 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.56026618 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.233266124 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.498266134 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.241266132 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.640266111 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.50026694 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14326672 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09426685 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04926661 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)63.600266135 of 138

UCLA defence

UCLA defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.12727512 of 138
success rate0.32727516 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.347275110 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.10527526 of 138
rush: success rate0.32827526 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.79927528 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.11927511 of 138
pass: success rate0.33327519 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.845275128 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.38927521 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.22027518 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.36527521 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.250275124 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.833275116 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.00027551 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.185275105 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.10527579 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.080275117 of 138
opponent average starting field position77.400275136 of 138

MINN defence

MINN defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.04123072 of 138
success rate0.37023052 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20523061 of 138
rush: points added per play0.07423086 of 138
rush: success rate0.38723057 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.87023047 of 138
pass: points added per play0.18023082 of 138
pass: success rate0.36923045 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.54323068 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.42023046 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.27523062 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.68023054 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.270230131 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.57123017 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.471230127 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.237230133 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.172230135 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.06523083 of 138
opponent average starting field position78.800230138 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs