UCLA · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-07 · time TBA · Huntington Bank Stadium
Minnesota · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
MINN pass rush9.3% 9716th14.5% 1796thfaces UCLA5.7% 10680th7.5% ~2.5 sacks
UCLA pass rush4.4% 13783rd9.4% 26555thfaces MINN2.7% 11120th3.5% ~1.2 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UCLA with the ball

UCLA offence vs MINN defenceUCLA offenceMINN defencerank gap
points added per play0.28727th0.04172nd+45
success rate0.49430th0.37052nd+22
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.25358th1.20561st+3
rush: points added per play0.4072nd0.07486th+84
rush: success rate0.5735th0.38757th+52
rush: explosiveness1.06431st0.87047th+16
pass: points added per play0.124103rd0.18082nd-21
pass: success rate0.394101st0.36945th-56
pass: explosiveness1.66840th1.54368th+28
standard downs: success rate0.55226th0.42046th+20
passing downs: success rate0.34250th0.27562nd+12
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.9751st2.68054th+53
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.0963rd0.270131st+128
short-yardage conversion rate0.84220th0.57117th-3
points per trip inside the 404.34345th4.471127th+82
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13253rd0.237133rd+80
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05718th0.172135th+117
havoc allowed by the secondary0.075118th0.06583rd-35
average starting field position (yards from own goal)63.700134th——

MINN with the ball

MINN offence vs UCLA defenceMINN offenceUCLA defencerank gap
points added per play0.12981st-0.12712th-69
success rate0.47047th0.32716th-31
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.092126th1.347110th-16
rush: points added per play0.023107th-0.10526th-81
rush: success rate0.47444th0.32826th-18
rush: explosiveness0.747126th0.79928th-98
pass: points added per play0.27364th-0.11911th-53
pass: success rate0.47944th0.33319th-25
pass: explosiveness1.355120th1.845128th+8
standard downs: success rate0.56018th0.38921st+3
passing downs: success rate0.233124th0.22018th-106
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.498134th2.36521st-113
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.241132nd0.250124th-8
short-yardage conversion rate0.640111th0.833116th+5
points per trip inside the 403.50094th3.00051st-43
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14372nd0.185105th+33
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09485th0.10579th-6
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04961st0.080117th+56
average starting field position (yards from own goal)63.600135th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.