Nevada · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-31 · time TBA · Rose Bowl
UCLA · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UCLA pass rush4.4% 13783rd9.4% 26555thfaces NEV5.3% 7574th4.9% ~1.6 sacks
NEV pass rush4.7% 8578th5.2% 230133rdfaces UCLA5.7% 10680th5.2% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

NEV with the ball

NEV offence vs UCLA defenceNEV offenceUCLA defencerank gap
points added per play0.09396th-0.12712th-84
success rate0.41499th0.32716th-83
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.29544th1.347110th+66
rush: points added per play0.21835th-0.10526th-9
rush: success rate0.49331st0.32826th-5
rush: explosiveness1.08923rd0.79928th+5
pass: points added per play-0.015128th-0.11911th-117
pass: success rate0.324133rd0.33319th-114
pass: explosiveness1.69135th1.845128th+93
standard downs: success rate0.46695th0.38921st-74
passing downs: success rate0.30576th0.22018th-58
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.23652nd2.36521st-31
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.197100th0.250124th+24
short-yardage conversion rate0.640112th0.833116th+4
points per trip inside the 404.04562nd3.00051st-11
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12947th0.185105th+58
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07442nd0.10579th+37
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05574th0.080117th+43
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.30028th——

UCLA with the ball

UCLA offence vs NEV defenceUCLA offenceNEV defencerank gap
points added per play0.28727th0.149100th+73
success rate0.49430th0.42190th+60
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.25358th1.12031st-27
rush: points added per play0.4072nd0.125108th+106
rush: success rate0.5735th0.438103rd+98
rush: explosiveness1.06431st0.87452nd+21
pass: points added per play0.124103rd0.271102nd-1
pass: success rate0.394101st0.42293rd-8
pass: explosiveness1.66840th1.53564th+24
standard downs: success rate0.55226th0.47489th+63
passing downs: success rate0.34250th0.30591st+41
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.9751st3.272120th+119
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.0963rd0.14622nd+19
short-yardage conversion rate0.84220th0.62533rd+13
points per trip inside the 404.34345th3.24061st+16
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13253rd0.1127th-46
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05718th0.0636th-12
havoc allowed by the secondary0.075118th0.04939th-79
average starting field position (yards from own goal)63.700134th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.