Wisconsin · away
at
Final WIS 24 – 20 PSU
Saturday 2026-09-26 17:00 · Beaver Stadium
Penn State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
PSU pass rush4.3% 11684th8.3% 22878thfaces WIS2.9% 10227th3.6% ~1.2 sacks
WIS pass rush3.3% 90101st6.6% 181114thfaces PSU4.4% 11359th3.9% ~1.3 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

WIS with the ball

WIS offence vs PSU defenceWIS offencePSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.14275th-0.10319th-56
success rate0.42389th0.31510th-79
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.39119th1.17147th+28
rush: points added per play0.18344th0.04074th+30
rush: success rate0.368122nd0.33931st-91
rush: explosiveness1.2416th1.129125th+119
pass: points added per play0.17688th-0.1643rd-85
pass: success rate0.48836th0.2966th-30
pass: explosiveness1.50781st1.2074th-77
standard downs: success rate0.48282nd0.36511th-71
passing downs: success rate0.30085th0.22423rd-62
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.94892nd2.52933rd-59
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15455th0.229109th+54
short-yardage conversion rate0.562127th0.66750th-77
points per trip inside the 403.333106th3.63688th-18
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16399th0.195114th+15
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08155th0.11294th+39
havoc allowed by the secondary0.081127th0.083120th-7
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.10098th——

PSU with the ball

PSU offence vs WIS defencePSU offenceWIS defencerank gap
points added per play0.22055th-0.05130th-25
success rate0.41894th0.34022nd-72
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.29942nd1.04213th-29
rush: points added per play0.10278th0.07888th+10
rush: success rate0.40999th0.33830th-69
rush: explosiveness0.92981st0.87251st-30
pass: points added per play0.39132nd-0.03024th-8
pass: success rate0.43472nd0.37246th-26
pass: explosiveness1.81317th1.1873rd-14
standard downs: success rate0.47392nd0.42853rd-39
passing downs: success rate0.270106th0.1632nd-104
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.835105th2.92885th-20
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13634th0.1051st-33
short-yardage conversion rate0.72782nd0.72272nd-10
points per trip inside the 403.96766th3.47475th+9
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11633rd0.16273rd+40
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05819th0.07734th+15
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05879th0.085123rd+44
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.800126th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.