Purdue · away
at
Final PUR 38 – 52 UCLA
Saturday 2026-09-19 23:00 · Rose Bowl
UCLA · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The units, side by side

PURUCLAbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence6881Offence: points per play — defence092Offence: success rate — offence6679Offence: success rate — defence189Offence: explosiveness — offence3858Offence: explosiveness — defence1820Run game — offence3999Run game — defence282Pass game — offence7926Pass game — defence993Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence39100Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence1085Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence5962Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence7324

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsPUR by 20UCLA by 60

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). UCLA wins about 89% of the time at a number like ours.

PUR

Games4
Plays per game71.5
Drives per game10.8
SP+-6.4 (94th, offence 57th, defence 120th)
Returning production48% (pass 97%, rush 61%, receiving 22%)

UCLA

Games4
Plays per game66.2
Drives per game13.0
SP+13.8 (24th, offence 16th, defence 40th)
Returning production57% (pass 55%, rush 86%, receiving 34%)

What each side chooses to do

OffencePURUCLA
pass rate, all downs56%20th41%117th
pass rate, standard downs48%19th34%118th
pass rate, 1st down49%27th37%107th
no-huddle share44%88th19%111th
pass rate, passing downs76%14th61%83rd
pass rate, red zone51%17th30%108th
seconds per play (own drives)29.463rd30.534th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

PUR offence

PUR offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.23728645 of 138
success rate0.46528648 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.19828686 of 138
rush: points added per play0.08328684 of 138
rush: success rate0.42928688 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.88328688 of 138
pass: points added per play0.39928630 of 138
pass: success rate0.50628628 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.408286109 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.50728654 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.35428644 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.02728685 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15928657 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.78928646 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.63028686 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13328657 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.10128699 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03128616 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.80028618 of 138

UCLA offence

UCLA offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.28726527 of 138
success rate0.49426530 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.25326558 of 138
rush: points added per play0.4072652 of 138
rush: success rate0.5732655 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.06426531 of 138
pass: points added per play0.124265103 of 138
pass: success rate0.394265101 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.66826540 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.55226526 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.34226550 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.9752651 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.0962653 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.84226520 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.34326545 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13226553 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05726518 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.075265118 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)63.700265134 of 138

PUR defence

PUR defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.351258138 of 138
success rate0.500258136 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.366258114 of 138
rush: points added per play0.300258135 of 138
rush: success rate0.518258136 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.054258107 of 138
pass: points added per play0.412258126 of 138
pass: success rate0.469258119 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.827258125 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.536258132 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.413258135 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.319258124 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.15125826 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.76225893 of 138
points per trip inside the 405.200258136 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14025838 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.08125838 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05825861 of 138
opponent average starting field position73.30025898 of 138

UCLA defence

UCLA defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.12727512 of 138
success rate0.32727516 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.347275110 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.10527526 of 138
rush: success rate0.32827526 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.79927528 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.11927511 of 138
pass: success rate0.33327519 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.845275128 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.38927521 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.22027518 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.36527521 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.250275124 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.833275116 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.00027551 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.185275105 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.10527579 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.080275117 of 138
opponent average starting field position77.400275136 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs