Purdue · away
at
Final PUR 38 – 52 UCLA
Saturday 2026-09-19 23:00 · Rose Bowl
UCLA · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UCLA pass rush4.4% 13783rd9.4% 26555thfaces PUR8.4% 119114th6.4% ~2.1 sacks
PUR pass rush3.4% 8899th5.9% 205127thfaces UCLA5.7% 10680th4.5% ~1.5 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

PUR with the ball

PUR offence vs UCLA defencePUR offenceUCLA defencerank gap
points added per play0.23745th-0.12712th-33
success rate0.46548th0.32716th-32
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.19886th1.347110th+24
rush: points added per play0.08384th-0.10526th-58
rush: success rate0.42988th0.32826th-62
rush: explosiveness0.88388th0.79928th-60
pass: points added per play0.39930th-0.11911th-19
pass: success rate0.50628th0.33319th-9
pass: explosiveness1.408109th1.845128th+19
standard downs: success rate0.50754th0.38921st-33
passing downs: success rate0.35444th0.22018th-26
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.02785th2.36521st-64
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15957th0.250124th+67
short-yardage conversion rate0.78946th0.833116th+70
points per trip inside the 403.63086th3.00051st-35
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13357th0.185105th+48
havoc allowed by the front seven0.10199th0.10579th-20
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03116th0.080117th+101
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.80018th——

UCLA with the ball

UCLA offence vs PUR defenceUCLA offencePUR defencerank gap
points added per play0.28727th0.351138th+111
success rate0.49430th0.500136th+106
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.25358th1.366114th+56
rush: points added per play0.4072nd0.300135th+133
rush: success rate0.5735th0.518136th+131
rush: explosiveness1.06431st1.054107th+76
pass: points added per play0.124103rd0.412126th+23
pass: success rate0.394101st0.469119th+18
pass: explosiveness1.66840th1.827125th+85
standard downs: success rate0.55226th0.536132nd+106
passing downs: success rate0.34250th0.413135th+85
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.9751st3.319124th+123
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.0963rd0.15126th+23
short-yardage conversion rate0.84220th0.76293rd+73
points per trip inside the 404.34345th5.200136th+91
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13253rd0.14038th-15
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05718th0.08138th+20
havoc allowed by the secondary0.075118th0.05861st-57
average starting field position (yards from own goal)63.700134th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.