Utah State · away
at
Final USU 14 – 16 WASH
Saturday 2026-09-12 15:30 · Husky Stadium
Washington · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
WASH pass rush7.8% 9026th13.7% 1757thfaces USU8.5% 94116th8.1% ~2.7 sacks
USU pass rush2.3% 131122nd7.0% 228108thfaces WASH8.0% 112109th5.2% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

USU with the ball

USU offence vs WASH defenceUSU offenceWASH defencerank gap
points added per play-0.071132nd-0.1486th-126
success rate0.361128th0.34426th-102
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.31532nd1.16146th+14
rush: points added per play-0.103132nd-0.2089th-123
rush: success rate0.358126th0.32120th-106
rush: explosiveness0.85399th0.74122nd-77
pass: points added per play-0.032130th-0.00330th-100
pass: success rate0.358125th0.38561st-64
pass: explosiveness1.73828th1.55470th+42
standard downs: success rate0.363137th0.38118th-119
passing downs: success rate0.35841st0.27359th+18
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07477th2.32317th-60
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.208110th0.305135th+25
short-yardage conversion rate0.300138th0.3331st-137
points per trip inside the 401.810135th2.60923rd-112
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.183125th0.203119th-6
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09178th0.121111th+33
havoc allowed by the secondary0.091136th0.082119th-17
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.10097th——

WASH with the ball

WASH offence vs USU defenceWASH offenceUSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.15173rd0.02162nd-11
success rate0.44664th0.40579th+15
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20780th1.13335th-45
rush: points added per play0.05592nd0.00862nd-30
rush: success rate0.394110th0.40873rd-37
rush: explosiveness0.89286th1.00693rd+7
pass: points added per play0.27265th0.04443rd-22
pass: success rate0.47647th0.40473rd+26
pass: explosiveness1.391117th1.2215th-112
standard downs: success rate0.49270th0.46079th+9
passing downs: success rate0.30282nd0.29283rd+1
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.815110th2.60243rd-67
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.221122nd0.21697th-25
short-yardage conversion rate0.615119th0.73780th-39
points per trip inside the 403.86273rd3.03753rd-20
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13254th0.13532nd-22
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08567th0.07121st-46
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04756th0.06482nd+26
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.40074th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.