Penn State · away
at
Final PSU 27 – 9 TEM
Saturday 2026-09-12 12:00 · Lincoln Financial Field
Temple · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The units, side by side

PSUTEMbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence6167Offence: points per play — defence8711Offence: success rate — offence3244Offence: success rate — defence9312Offence: explosiveness — offence7071Offence: explosiveness — defence6658Run game — offence4484Run game — defence4715Pass game — offence7743Pass game — defence9918Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence2475Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence7748Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence7796Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence1897

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsPSU by 64TEM by 16

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). PSU wins about 93% of the time at a number like ours.

PSU

Games4
Plays per game68.8
Drives per game12.2
SP+16.9 (15th, offence 28th, defence 12th)
Returning production8% (pass 3%, rush -2%, receiving 14%)

TEM

Games4
Plays per game61.5
Drives per game9.8
SP+-6.1 (92nd, offence 67th, defence 112th)
Returning production37% (pass 0%, rush 23%, receiving 69%)

What each side chooses to do

OffencePSUTEM
pass rate, all downs43%111th36%131st
pass rate, standard downs35%116th31%128th
pass rate, 1st down29%131st29%130th
no-huddle share85%36th64%67th
pass rate, passing downs65%57th52%124th
pass rate, red zone33%93rd33%94th
seconds per play (own drives)27.984th30.144th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

PSU offence

PSU offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.22027555 of 138
success rate0.41827594 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.29927542 of 138
rush: points added per play0.10227578 of 138
rush: success rate0.40927599 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.92927581 of 138
pass: points added per play0.39127532 of 138
pass: success rate0.43427572 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.81327517 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.47327592 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.270275106 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.835275105 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13627534 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.72727582 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.96727566 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11627533 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05827519 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05827579 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.800275126 of 138

TEM offence

TEM offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.23724646 of 138
success rate0.43524678 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30124641 of 138
rush: points added per play0.25624623 of 138
rush: success rate0.46124660 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.06024632 of 138
pass: points added per play0.20524679 of 138
pass: success rate0.384246108 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.83424615 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.47524689 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.33324656 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.32824635 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16924674 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.72724683 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.381246103 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0892467 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.04924611 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04124636 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10024616 of 138

PSU defence

PSU defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.10324119 of 138
success rate0.31524110 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.17124147 of 138
rush: points added per play0.04024174 of 138
rush: success rate0.33924131 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.129241125 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.1642413 of 138
pass: success rate0.2962416 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.2072414 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.36524111 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.22424123 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.52924133 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.229241109 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.66724150 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.63624188 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.195241114 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.11224194 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.083241120 of 138
opponent average starting field position76.300241131 of 138

TEM defence

TEM defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.209267123 of 138
success rate0.457267121 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20226759 of 138
rush: points added per play0.155267118 of 138
rush: success rate0.455267111 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.88426758 of 138
pass: points added per play0.306267113 of 138
pass: success rate0.474267121 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.57626780 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.497267111 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.347267120 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.88326772 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.1102674 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.76926796 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.58626783 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.1092675 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.0522672 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05626759 of 138
opponent average starting field position72.40026778 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs