Penn State · away
at
Final PSU 27 – 9 TEM
Saturday 2026-09-12 12:00 · Lincoln Financial Field
Temple · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TEM pass rush1.2% 84134th4.0% 202138thfaces PSU4.4% 11359th2.8% ~0.9 sacks
PSU pass rush4.3% 11684th8.3% 22878thfaces TEM4.4% 6858th4.4% ~1.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

PSU with the ball

PSU offence vs TEM defencePSU offenceTEM defencerank gap
points added per play0.22055th0.209123rd+68
success rate0.41894th0.457121st+27
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.29942nd1.20259th+17
rush: points added per play0.10278th0.155118th+40
rush: success rate0.40999th0.455111th+12
rush: explosiveness0.92981st0.88458th-23
pass: points added per play0.39132nd0.306113th+81
pass: success rate0.43472nd0.474121st+49
pass: explosiveness1.81317th1.57680th+63
standard downs: success rate0.47392nd0.497111th+19
passing downs: success rate0.270106th0.347120th+14
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.835105th2.88372nd-33
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13634th0.1104th-30
short-yardage conversion rate0.72782nd0.76996th+14
points per trip inside the 403.96766th3.58683rd+17
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11633rd0.1095th-28
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05819th0.0522nd-17
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05879th0.05659th-20
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.800126th——

TEM with the ball

TEM offence vs PSU defenceTEM offencePSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.23746th-0.10319th-27
success rate0.43578th0.31510th-68
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30141st1.17147th+6
rush: points added per play0.25623rd0.04074th+51
rush: success rate0.46160th0.33931st-29
rush: explosiveness1.06032nd1.129125th+93
pass: points added per play0.20579th-0.1643rd-76
pass: success rate0.384108th0.2966th-102
pass: explosiveness1.83415th1.2074th-11
standard downs: success rate0.47589th0.36511th-78
passing downs: success rate0.33356th0.22423rd-33
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.32835th2.52933rd-2
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16974th0.229109th+35
short-yardage conversion rate0.72783rd0.66750th-33
points per trip inside the 403.381103rd3.63688th-15
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0897th0.195114th+107
havoc allowed by the front seven0.04911th0.11294th+83
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04136th0.083120th+84
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10016th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.