Massachusetts · away
at
Final MASS 37 – 21 RUTG
Thursday 2026-09-03 18:00 · SHI Stadium
Rutgers · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
RUTG pass rush3.5% 8695th7.6% 18593rdfaces MASS5.0% 4066th4.2% ~1.4 sacks
MASS pass rush9.1% 8818th7.3% 13699thfaces RUTG7.4% 108100th8.2% ~2.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

MASS with the ball

MASS offence vs RUTG defenceMASS offenceRUTG defencerank gap
points added per play0.28030th0.149101st+71
success rate0.45059th0.436103rd+44
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.23765th1.20258th-7
rush: points added per play0.26718th0.117103rd+85
rush: success rate0.48139th0.464120th+81
rush: explosiveness1.02247th0.90065th+18
pass: points added per play0.36244th0.307114th+70
pass: success rate0.40794th0.41583rd-11
pass: explosiveness1.67139th1.58985th+46
standard downs: success rate0.51050th0.497110th+60
passing downs: success rate0.30281st0.29787th+6
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.52018th3.00293rd+75
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14140th0.20077th+37
short-yardage conversion rate0.550128th0.75086th-42
points per trip inside the 403.88972nd3.65290th+18
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.09512th0.13737th+25
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07339th0.10073rd+34
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0236th0.03712th+6
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.000131st——

RUTG with the ball

RUTG offence vs MASS defenceRUTG offenceMASS defencerank gap
points added per play0.13577th-0.13911th-66
success rate0.48237th0.36645th+8
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30140th1.0206th-34
rush: points added per play0.024106th-0.2774th-102
rush: success rate0.48934th0.35335th+1
rush: explosiveness0.766123rd0.3161st-122
pass: points added per play0.33449th0.04644th-5
pass: success rate0.47745th0.38965th+20
pass: explosiveness1.86112th1.53163rd+51
standard downs: success rate0.50852nd0.42147th-5
passing downs: success rate0.41812th0.26353rd+41
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13369th2.56738th-31
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16161st0.218101st+40
short-yardage conversion rate0.70094th0.70664th-30
points per trip inside the 403.96367th1.5001st-66
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14676th0.16169th-7
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06222nd0.08850th+28
havoc allowed by the secondary0.084129th0.073100th-29
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.00099th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.