Georgia Tech · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 · time TBA · Memorial Stadium (Clemson, SC)
Clemson · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
CLEM pass rush5.3% 15265th6.3% 284119thfaces GT8.3% 109112th6.8% ~2.2 sacks
GT pass rush3.5% 8797th8.1% 21182ndfaces CLEM8.6% 117117th6.0% ~2.0 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

GT with the ball

GT offence vs CLEM defenceGT offenceCLEM defencerank gap
points added per play0.14176th0.01758th-18
success rate0.44268th0.41083rd+15
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22171st1.18854th-17
rush: points added per play0.11273rd0.203127th+54
rush: success rate0.45267th0.492132nd+65
rush: explosiveness0.88587th0.88759th-28
pass: points added per play0.19184th-0.05519th-65
pass: success rate0.44368th0.34424th-44
pass: explosiveness1.51378th1.56373rd-5
standard downs: success rate0.50060th0.43055th-5
passing downs: success rate0.31271st0.368128th+57
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07476th3.459135th+59
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.202106th0.12912th-94
short-yardage conversion rate0.70693rd0.72774th-19
points per trip inside the 403.393101st2.34616th-85
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16295th0.16067th-28
havoc allowed by the front seven0.104105th0.07322nd-83
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05877th0.087125th+48
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.60066th——

CLEM with the ball

CLEM offence vs GT defenceCLEM offenceGT defencerank gap
points added per play-0.027125th0.155105th-20
success rate0.342132nd0.41385th-47
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.17594th1.26787th-7
rush: points added per play0.09382nd0.08291st+9
rush: success rate0.368120th0.447107th-13
rush: explosiveness1.02049th0.86545th-4
pass: points added per play0.001124th0.343121st-3
pass: success rate0.328131st0.36641st-90
pass: explosiveness1.400114th2.089138th+24
standard downs: success rate0.405129th0.44768th-61
passing downs: success rate0.228125th0.341115th-10
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.764114th2.90680th-34
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.211114th0.17138th-76
short-yardage conversion rate0.80035th0.68454th+19
points per trip inside the 403.095117th3.65491st-26
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.188127th0.16068th-59
havoc allowed by the front seven0.146136th0.121110th-26
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04239th0.03915th-24
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.40071st——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.