Florida State · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-07 · time TBA · Alumni Stadium (Chestnut Hill, MA)
Boston College · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
BC pass rush7.2% 8333rd10.8% 20428thfaces FSU8.1% 86111th7.7% ~2.5 sacks
FSU pass rush2.6% 113115th9.5% 20050thfaces BC7.5% 93104th5.1% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

FSU with the ball

FSU offence vs BC defenceFSU offenceBC defencerank gap
points added per play0.24741st0.00251st+10
success rate0.43480th0.39571st-9
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.5262nd1.23775th+73
rush: points added per play0.22434th0.00761st+27
rush: success rate0.44279th0.39059th-20
rush: explosiveness1.13116th1.030101st+85
pass: points added per play0.36742nd0.15576th+34
pass: success rate0.42383rd0.42292nd+9
pass: explosiveness2.0612nd1.49256th+54
standard downs: success rate0.451107th0.39827th-80
passing downs: success rate0.39221st0.388133rd+112
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.19660th3.01696th+36
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15250th0.19572nd+22
short-yardage conversion rate0.562126th0.65041st-85
points per trip inside the 404.88518th3.39169th+51
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14575th0.17483rd+8
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08052nd0.120107th+55
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06493rd0.05448th-45
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.30055th——

BC with the ball

BC offence vs FSU defenceBC offenceFSU defencerank gap
points added per play-0.032127th0.219125th-2
success rate0.389115th0.435102nd-13
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.164101st1.350111th+10
rush: points added per play-0.006115th0.134111th-4
rush: success rate0.43981st0.41479th-2
rush: explosiveness0.93579th0.95983rd+4
pass: points added per play0.063110th0.325116th+6
pass: success rate0.357126th0.458111th-15
pass: explosiveness1.53374th1.654102nd+28
standard downs: success rate0.46099th0.497109th+10
passing downs: success rate0.244116th0.316103rd-13
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.847103rd3.01095th-8
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.252134th0.18047th-87
short-yardage conversion rate0.68898th0.929135th+37
points per trip inside the 403.091118th3.52480th-38
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.179120th0.15658th-62
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111112th0.10175th-37
havoc allowed by the secondary0.069107th0.05449th-58
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.20058th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.