Louisville · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-07 · time TBA · Bobby Dodd Stadium
Georgia Tech · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
GT pass rush3.5% 8797th8.1% 21182ndfaces LOU7.4% 94102nd5.5% ~1.8 sacks
LOU pass rush5.2% 9666th6.5% 214115thfaces GT8.3% 109112th6.7% ~2.2 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

LOU with the ball

LOU offence vs GT defenceLOU offenceGT defencerank gap
points added per play0.34412th0.155105th+93
success rate0.50024th0.41385th+61
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.35323rd1.26787th+64
rush: points added per play0.20339th0.08291st+52
rush: success rate0.48635th0.447107th+72
rush: explosiveness1.03443rd0.86545th+2
pass: points added per play0.48718th0.343121st+103
pass: success rate0.51623rd0.36641st+18
pass: explosiveness1.66343rd2.089138th+95
standard downs: success rate0.56316th0.44768th+52
passing downs: success rate0.32464th0.341115th+51
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.809111th2.90680th-31
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19496th0.17138th-58
short-yardage conversion rate0.72284th0.68454th-30
points per trip inside the 404.39340th3.65491st+51
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14170th0.16068th-2
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111114th0.121110th-4
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03013th0.03915th+2
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.80082nd——

GT with the ball

GT offence vs LOU defenceGT offenceLOU defencerank gap
points added per play0.14176th0.10689th+13
success rate0.44268th0.40275th+7
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22171st1.23876th+5
rush: points added per play0.11273rd-0.01553rd-20
rush: success rate0.45267th0.43092nd+25
rush: explosiveness0.88587th0.71015th-72
pass: points added per play0.19184th0.378124th+40
pass: success rate0.44368th0.38158th-10
pass: explosiveness1.51378th1.964136th+58
standard downs: success rate0.50060th0.45576th+16
passing downs: success rate0.31271st0.27461st-10
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07476th3.02198th+22
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.202106th0.1216th-100
short-yardage conversion rate0.70693rd0.51711th-82
points per trip inside the 403.393101st3.61587th-14
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16295th0.13633rd-62
havoc allowed by the front seven0.104105th0.07323rd-82
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05877th0.06374th-3
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.60066th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.