Boston College · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-31 · time TBA · Wallace Wade Stadium
Duke · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
DUKE pass rush4.7% 10779th6.7% 179113thfaces BC7.5% 93104th6.1% ~2.0 sacks
BC pass rush7.2% 8333rd10.8% 20428thfaces DUKE0.0% 721st3.6% ~1.2 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

BC with the ball

BC offence vs DUKE defenceBC offenceDUKE defencerank gap
points added per play-0.032127th-0.06427th-100
success rate0.389115th0.35332nd-83
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.164101st1.07120th-81
rush: points added per play-0.006115th-0.20510th-105
rush: success rate0.43981st0.32321st-60
rush: explosiveness0.93579th0.4393rd-76
pass: points added per play0.063110th0.02736th-74
pass: success rate0.357126th0.37447th-79
pass: explosiveness1.53374th1.45549th-25
standard downs: success rate0.46099th0.44464th-35
passing downs: success rate0.244116th0.1833rd-113
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.847103rd2.62347th-56
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.252134th0.17240th-94
short-yardage conversion rate0.68898th0.70058th-40
points per trip inside the 403.091118th2.58822nd-96
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.179120th0.18399th-21
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111112th0.10681st-31
havoc allowed by the secondary0.069107th0.077108th+1
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.20058th——

DUKE with the ball

DUKE offence vs BC defenceDUKE offenceBC defencerank gap
points added per play0.29524th0.00251st+27
success rate0.44663rd0.39571st+8
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.32728th1.23775th+47
rush: points added per play0.23430th0.00761st+31
rush: success rate0.42391st0.39059th-32
rush: explosiveness1.14414th1.030101st+87
pass: points added per play0.42727th0.15576th+49
pass: success rate0.47646th0.42292nd+46
pass: explosiveness1.65944th1.49256th+12
standard downs: success rate0.49269th0.39827th-42
passing downs: success rate0.33755th0.388133rd+78
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.32337th3.01696th+59
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16160th0.19572nd+12
short-yardage conversion rate0.75064th0.65041st-23
points per trip inside the 404.67726th3.39169th+43
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0896th0.17483rd+77
havoc allowed by the front seven0.0434th0.120107th+103
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04653rd0.05448th-5
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.900110th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.