Virginia Tech · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-24 · time TBA · Memorial Stadium (Clemson, SC)
Clemson · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
CLEM pass rush5.3% 15265th6.3% 284119thfaces VT4.8% 12465th5.1% ~1.7 sacks
VT pass rush9.5% 9514th13.5% 1719thfaces CLEM8.6% 117117th9.0% ~3.0 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

VT with the ball

VT offence vs CLEM defenceVT offenceCLEM defencerank gap
points added per play0.24142nd0.01758th+16
success rate0.48436th0.41083rd+47
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20582nd1.18854th-28
rush: points added per play0.14960th0.203127th+67
rush: success rate0.50323rd0.492132nd+109
rush: explosiveness0.97169th0.88759th-10
pass: points added per play0.35746th-0.05519th-27
pass: success rate0.47151st0.34424th-27
pass: explosiveness1.47591st1.56373rd-18
standard downs: success rate0.50457th0.43055th-2
passing downs: success rate0.4279th0.368128th+119
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.99488th3.459135th+47
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.200103rd0.12912th-91
short-yardage conversion rate0.75073rd0.72774th+1
points per trip inside the 404.56735th2.34616th-19
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11125th0.16067th+42
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08976th0.07322nd-54
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0225th0.087125th+120
average starting field position (yards from own goal)66.400123rd——

CLEM with the ball

CLEM offence vs VT defenceCLEM offenceVT defencerank gap
points added per play-0.027125th-0.03038th-87
success rate0.342132nd0.33118th-114
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.17594th1.30999th+5
rush: points added per play0.09382nd-0.14717th-65
rush: success rate0.368120th0.2696th-114
rush: explosiveness1.02049th1.306135th+86
pass: points added per play0.001124th0.14273rd-51
pass: success rate0.328131st0.39170th-61
pass: explosiveness1.400114th1.34019th-95
standard downs: success rate0.405129th0.41339th-90
passing downs: success rate0.228125th0.20412th-113
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.764114th0.9861st-113
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.211114th0.403138th+24
short-yardage conversion rate0.80035th0.57118th-17
points per trip inside the 403.095117th2.52219th-98
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.188127th0.267138th+11
havoc allowed by the front seven0.146136th0.220138th+2
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04239th0.04735th-4
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.40071st——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.