Boston College · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-24 · time TBA · Bobby Dodd Stadium
Georgia Tech · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
GT pass rush3.5% 8797th8.1% 21182ndfaces BC7.5% 93104th5.5% ~1.8 sacks
BC pass rush7.2% 8333rd10.8% 20428thfaces GT8.3% 109112th7.7% ~2.6 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

BC with the ball

BC offence vs GT defenceBC offenceGT defencerank gap
points added per play-0.032127th0.155105th-22
success rate0.389115th0.41385th-30
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.164101st1.26787th-14
rush: points added per play-0.006115th0.08291st-24
rush: success rate0.43981st0.447107th+26
rush: explosiveness0.93579th0.86545th-34
pass: points added per play0.063110th0.343121st+11
pass: success rate0.357126th0.36641st-85
pass: explosiveness1.53374th2.089138th+64
standard downs: success rate0.46099th0.44768th-31
passing downs: success rate0.244116th0.341115th-1
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.847103rd2.90680th-23
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.252134th0.17138th-96
short-yardage conversion rate0.68898th0.68454th-44
points per trip inside the 403.091118th3.65491st-27
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.179120th0.16068th-52
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111112th0.121110th-2
havoc allowed by the secondary0.069107th0.03915th-92
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.20058th——

GT with the ball

GT offence vs BC defenceGT offenceBC defencerank gap
points added per play0.14176th0.00251st-25
success rate0.44268th0.39571st+3
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22171st1.23775th+4
rush: points added per play0.11273rd0.00761st-12
rush: success rate0.45267th0.39059th-8
rush: explosiveness0.88587th1.030101st+14
pass: points added per play0.19184th0.15576th-8
pass: success rate0.44368th0.42292nd+24
pass: explosiveness1.51378th1.49256th-22
standard downs: success rate0.50060th0.39827th-33
passing downs: success rate0.31271st0.388133rd+62
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07476th3.01696th+20
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.202106th0.19572nd-34
short-yardage conversion rate0.70693rd0.65041st-52
points per trip inside the 403.393101st3.39169th-32
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16295th0.17483rd-12
havoc allowed by the front seven0.104105th0.120107th+2
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05877th0.05448th-29
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.60066th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.