Duke · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-10 15:30 · Bobby Dodd Stadium
Georgia Tech · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
GT pass rush3.5% 8797th8.1% 21182ndfaces DUKE0.0% 721st1.7% ~0.6 sacks
DUKE pass rush4.7% 10779th6.7% 179113thfaces GT8.3% 109112th6.5% ~2.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

DUKE with the ball

DUKE offence vs GT defenceDUKE offenceGT defencerank gap
points added per play0.29524th0.155105th+81
success rate0.44663rd0.41385th+22
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.32728th1.26787th+59
rush: points added per play0.23430th0.08291st+61
rush: success rate0.42391st0.447107th+16
rush: explosiveness1.14414th0.86545th+31
pass: points added per play0.42727th0.343121st+94
pass: success rate0.47646th0.36641st-5
pass: explosiveness1.65944th2.089138th+94
standard downs: success rate0.49269th0.44768th-1
passing downs: success rate0.33755th0.341115th+60
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.32337th2.90680th+43
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16160th0.17138th-22
short-yardage conversion rate0.75064th0.68454th-10
points per trip inside the 404.67726th3.65491st+65
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0896th0.16068th+62
havoc allowed by the front seven0.0434th0.121110th+106
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04653rd0.03915th-38
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.900110th——

GT with the ball

GT offence vs DUKE defenceGT offenceDUKE defencerank gap
points added per play0.14176th-0.06427th-49
success rate0.44268th0.35332nd-36
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22171st1.07120th-51
rush: points added per play0.11273rd-0.20510th-63
rush: success rate0.45267th0.32321st-46
rush: explosiveness0.88587th0.4393rd-84
pass: points added per play0.19184th0.02736th-48
pass: success rate0.44368th0.37447th-21
pass: explosiveness1.51378th1.45549th-29
standard downs: success rate0.50060th0.44464th+4
passing downs: success rate0.31271st0.1833rd-68
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07476th2.62347th-29
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.202106th0.17240th-66
short-yardage conversion rate0.70693rd0.70058th-35
points per trip inside the 403.393101st2.58822nd-79
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16295th0.18399th+4
havoc allowed by the front seven0.104105th0.10681st-24
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05877th0.077108th+31
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.60066th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.