Notre Dame · away
at
ND -21.5
Saturday 2026-10-03 12:00 · Kenan Stadium
North Carolina · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UNC pass rush7.5% 6729th9.0% 13362ndfaces ND0.9% 1135th4.2% ~1.4 sacks
ND pass rush10.2% 10810th12.7% 21214thfaces UNC9.5% 63123rd9.9% ~3.3 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ND with the ball

ND offence vs UNC defenceND offenceUNC defencerank gap
points added per play0.33313th-0.01941st+28
success rate0.51613th0.39369th+56
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.116122nd1.0248th-114
rush: points added per play0.14265th0.05880th+15
rush: success rate0.48238th0.42990th+52
rush: explosiveness0.795114th0.82732nd-82
pass: points added per play0.56311th0.02737th+26
pass: success rate0.55811th0.37649th+38
pass: explosiveness1.45996th1.2426th-90
standard downs: success rate0.5996th0.47187th+81
passing downs: success rate0.214132nd0.22725th-107
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.94393rd2.94088th-5
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15353rd0.1227th-46
short-yardage conversion rate0.76262nd0.875129th+67
points per trip inside the 405.2866th2.68829th+23
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.10116th0.14140th+24
havoc allowed by the front seven0.0353rd0.09765th+62
havoc allowed by the secondary0.066101st0.04428th-73
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.30044th——

UNC with the ball

UNC offence vs ND defenceUNC offenceND defencerank gap
points added per play0.11886th-0.11915th-71
success rate0.48435th0.34224th-11
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.038134th1.13837th-97
rush: points added per play0.12471st-0.2298th-63
rush: success rate0.53410th0.30412th+2
rush: explosiveness0.706130th0.81230th-100
pass: points added per play0.14894th-0.02126th-68
pass: success rate0.42284th0.37448th-36
pass: explosiveness1.45299th1.37825th-74
standard downs: success rate0.53238th0.39022nd-16
passing downs: success rate0.37530th0.25344th+14
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.8725th2.32116th+11
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12520th0.223103rd+83
short-yardage conversion rate0.77851st0.73377th+26
points per trip inside the 404.00065th1.6252nd-63
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13251st0.240135th+84
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08256th0.169134th+78
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04962nd0.07199th+37
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.00080th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.