Virginia Tech · away
at
Final VT 21 – 14 BC
Saturday 2026-09-26 12:00 · Alumni Stadium (Chestnut Hill, MA)
Boston College · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
BC pass rush7.2% 8333rd10.8% 20428thfaces VT4.8% 12465th6.0% ~2.0 sacks
VT pass rush9.5% 9514th13.5% 1719thfaces BC7.5% 93104th8.5% ~2.8 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

VT with the ball

VT offence vs BC defenceVT offenceBC defencerank gap
points added per play0.24142nd0.00251st+9
success rate0.48436th0.39571st+35
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20582nd1.23775th-7
rush: points added per play0.14960th0.00761st+1
rush: success rate0.50323rd0.39059th+36
rush: explosiveness0.97169th1.030101st+32
pass: points added per play0.35746th0.15576th+30
pass: success rate0.47151st0.42292nd+41
pass: explosiveness1.47591st1.49256th-35
standard downs: success rate0.50457th0.39827th-30
passing downs: success rate0.4279th0.388133rd+124
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.99488th3.01696th+8
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.200103rd0.19572nd-31
short-yardage conversion rate0.75073rd0.65041st-32
points per trip inside the 404.56735th3.39169th+34
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11125th0.17483rd+58
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08976th0.120107th+31
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0225th0.05448th+43
average starting field position (yards from own goal)66.400123rd——

BC with the ball

BC offence vs VT defenceBC offenceVT defencerank gap
points added per play-0.032127th-0.03038th-89
success rate0.389115th0.33118th-97
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.164101st1.30999th-2
rush: points added per play-0.006115th-0.14717th-98
rush: success rate0.43981st0.2696th-75
rush: explosiveness0.93579th1.306135th+56
pass: points added per play0.063110th0.14273rd-37
pass: success rate0.357126th0.39170th-56
pass: explosiveness1.53374th1.34019th-55
standard downs: success rate0.46099th0.41339th-60
passing downs: success rate0.244116th0.20412th-104
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.847103rd0.9861st-102
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.252134th0.403138th+4
short-yardage conversion rate0.68898th0.57118th-80
points per trip inside the 403.091118th2.52219th-99
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.179120th0.267138th+18
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111112th0.220138th+26
havoc allowed by the secondary0.069107th0.04735th-72
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.20058th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.