Clemson · away
at
Final CLEM 24 – 10 CAL
Friday 2026-09-25 22:30 · California Memorial Stadium
California · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
CAL pass rush6.1% 9947th6.5% 201117thfaces CLEM8.6% 117117th7.3% ~2.4 sacks
CLEM pass rush5.3% 15265th6.3% 284119thfaces CAL3.5% 11438th4.4% ~1.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

CLEM with the ball

CLEM offence vs CAL defenceCLEM offenceCAL defencerank gap
points added per play-0.027125th0.01456th-69
success rate0.342132nd0.36949th-83
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.17594th1.341109th+15
rush: points added per play0.09382nd0.217129th+47
rush: success rate0.368120th0.42084th-36
rush: explosiveness1.02049th1.122123rd+74
pass: points added per play0.001124th-0.09213th-111
pass: success rate0.328131st0.32015th-116
pass: explosiveness1.400114th1.644100th-14
standard downs: success rate0.405129th0.43156th-73
passing downs: success rate0.228125th0.25545th-80
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.764114th3.160110th-4
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.211114th0.14518th-96
short-yardage conversion rate0.80035th0.889130th+95
points per trip inside the 403.095117th2.61525th-92
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.188127th0.13127th-100
havoc allowed by the front seven0.146136th0.0635th-131
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04239th0.06789th+50
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.40071st——

CAL with the ball

CAL offence vs CLEM defenceCAL offenceCLEM defencerank gap
points added per play0.007120th0.01758th-62
success rate0.403102nd0.41083rd-19
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.19388th1.18854th-34
rush: points added per play-0.056123rd0.203127th+4
rush: success rate0.376119th0.492132nd+13
rush: explosiveness0.763124th0.88759th-65
pass: points added per play0.13198th-0.05519th-79
pass: success rate0.42977th0.34424th-53
pass: explosiveness1.47492nd1.56373rd-19
standard downs: success rate0.459101st0.43055th-46
passing downs: success rate0.29091st0.368128th+37
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.819108th3.459135th+27
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.205109th0.12912th-97
short-yardage conversion rate0.667102nd0.72774th-28
points per trip inside the 402.720127th2.34616th-111
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.169107th0.16067th-40
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09483rd0.07322nd-61
havoc allowed by the secondary0.076120th0.087125th+5
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.70022nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.