Old Dominion · away
at
Final ODU 21 – 44 VT
Saturday 2026-09-12 12:00 · Lane Stadium
Virginia Tech · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
VT pass rush9.5% 9514th13.5% 1719thfaces ODU14.3% 91135th11.9% ~3.9 sacks
ODU pass rush5.4% 11262nd10.9% 22926thfaces VT4.8% 12465th5.1% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ODU with the ball

ODU offence vs VT defenceODU offenceVT defencerank gap
points added per play-0.100135th-0.03038th-97
success rate0.310138th0.33118th-120
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.4835th1.30999th+94
rush: points added per play-0.076126th-0.14717th-109
rush: success rate0.331136th0.2696th-130
rush: explosiveness1.2984th1.306135th+131
pass: points added per play-0.137136th0.14273rd-63
pass: success rate0.290136th0.39170th-66
pass: explosiveness1.67737th1.34019th-18
standard downs: success rate0.299138th0.41339th-99
passing downs: success rate0.32663rd0.20412th-51
line yards per rush (the O-line)1.613138th0.9861st-137
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.315138th0.403138th0
short-yardage conversion rate0.300137th0.57118th-119
points per trip inside the 402.913124th2.52219th-105
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.243138th0.267138th0
havoc allowed by the front seven0.205138th0.220138th0
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03825th0.04735th+10
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.10061st——

VT with the ball

VT offence vs ODU defenceVT offenceODU defencerank gap
points added per play0.24142nd-0.01744th+2
success rate0.48436th0.33921st-15
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20582nd1.24279th-3
rush: points added per play0.14960th-0.10625th-35
rush: success rate0.50323rd0.31818th-5
rush: explosiveness0.97169th0.96385th+16
pass: points added per play0.35746th0.10261st+15
pass: success rate0.47151st0.36133rd-18
pass: explosiveness1.47591st1.57881st-10
standard downs: success rate0.50457th0.36813th-44
passing downs: success rate0.4279th0.28678th+69
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.99488th2.38924th-64
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.200103rd0.223104th+1
short-yardage conversion rate0.75073rd0.61930th-43
points per trip inside the 404.56735th3.33366th+31
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11125th0.16476th+51
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08976th0.128116th+40
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0225th0.03711th+6
average starting field position (yards from own goal)66.400123rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.