Tulane · away
at
Final TULN 3 – 17 DUKE
Saturday 2026-09-05 15:30 · Wallace Wade Stadium
Duke · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
DUKE pass rush4.7% 10779th6.7% 179113thfaces TULN8.6% 116118th6.6% ~2.2 sacks
TULN pass rush4.1% 12289th7.3% 275100thfaces DUKE0.0% 721st2.1% ~0.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TULN with the ball

TULN offence vs DUKE defenceTULN offenceDUKE defencerank gap
points added per play0.10392nd-0.06427th-65
success rate0.343131st0.35332nd-99
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.5133rd1.07120th+17
rush: points added per play0.16151st-0.20510th-41
rush: success rate0.379118th0.32321st-97
rush: explosiveness1.3461st0.4393rd+2
pass: points added per play0.020120th0.02736th-84
pass: success rate0.304134th0.37447th-87
pass: explosiveness1.70334th1.45549th+15
standard downs: success rate0.408128th0.44464th-64
passing downs: success rate0.237122nd0.1833rd-119
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.573129th2.62347th-82
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.218120th0.17240th-80
short-yardage conversion rate0.75072nd0.70058th-14
points per trip inside the 402.474132nd2.58822nd-110
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.200133rd0.18399th-34
havoc allowed by the front seven0.135133rd0.10681st-52
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06598th0.077108th+10
average starting field position (yards from own goal)75.1006th——

DUKE with the ball

DUKE offence vs TULN defenceDUKE offenceTULN defencerank gap
points added per play0.29524th0.171115th+91
success rate0.44663rd0.39672nd+9
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.32728th1.30697th+69
rush: points added per play0.23430th0.112101st+71
rush: success rate0.42391st0.37048th-43
rush: explosiveness1.14414th1.074112th+98
pass: points added per play0.42727th0.300110th+83
pass: success rate0.47646th0.443107th+61
pass: explosiveness1.65944th1.54669th+25
standard downs: success rate0.49269th0.44162nd-7
passing downs: success rate0.33755th0.317104th+49
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.32337th3.086106th+69
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16160th0.16233rd-27
short-yardage conversion rate0.75064th0.76997th+33
points per trip inside the 404.67726th3.30865th+39
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0896th0.1106th0
havoc allowed by the front seven0.0434th0.06711th+7
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04653rd0.04224th-29
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.900110th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.