Miami (OH) · away
at
Final M-OH 14 – 59 PITT
Saturday 2026-09-05 12:30 · Acrisure Stadium
Pittsburgh · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The units, side by side

M-OHPITTbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence6982Offence: points per play — defence1688Offence: success rate — offence4182Offence: success rate — defence1799Offence: explosiveness — offence9257Offence: explosiveness — defence2614Run game — offence2038Run game — defence4092Pass game — offence9689Pass game — defence1180Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence2872Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence5099Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence4391Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence9934

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsM-OH by 17PITT by 63

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). PITT wins about 93% of the time at a number like ours.

M-OH

Games4
Plays per game58.8
Drives per game10.2
SP+-4.3 (88th, offence 86th, defence 91st)
Returning production14% (pass -2%, rush 33%, receiving 13%)

PITT

Games4
Plays per game73.0
Drives per game11.5
SP+14.7 (20th, offence 36th, defence 15th)
Returning production40% (pass 59%, rush 67%, receiving 24%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceM-OHPITT
pass rate, all downs52%40th53%31st
pass rate, standard downs41%72nd47%26th
pass rate, 1st down47%40th47%36th
no-huddle share22%109th23%107th
pass rate, passing downs74%24th68%44th
pass rate, red zone22%127th57%8th
seconds per play (own drives)30.533rd26.5110th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

M-OH offence

M-OH offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.23923543 of 138
success rate0.43023582 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.42623512 of 138
rush: points added per play0.017235111 of 138
rush: success rate0.389235111 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.87723592 of 138
pass: points added per play0.6192356 of 138
pass: success rate0.48723537 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.86723511 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.48823574 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.30123583 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.871235100 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.212235116 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.667235104 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.90923570 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14923579 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111235115 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03823524 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.00023563 of 138

PITT offence

PITT offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.29429225 of 138
success rate0.49729226 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24929260 of 138
rush: points added per play0.07829286 of 138
rush: success rate0.46029262 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.809292111 of 138
pass: points added per play0.50729216 of 138
pass: success rate0.53029214 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.59529258 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.52829240 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.41229213 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.30929239 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.18229288 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.632292115 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.23329255 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.09629213 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05829220 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03829227 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.40029273 of 138

M-OH defence

M-OH defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.179260116 of 138
success rate0.450260115 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.316260102 of 138
rush: points added per play0.06526083 of 138
rush: success rate0.42526086 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.98526091 of 138
pass: points added per play0.372260123 of 138
pass: success rate0.483260125 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.52926062 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.509260117 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.341260116 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.86026069 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.21726098 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.778260101 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.700260129 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.1042602 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.0652609 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.03826013 of 138
opponent average starting field position72.50026080 of 138

PITT defence

PITT defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.10724018 of 138
success rate0.2872402 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.379240119 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.17824012 of 138
rush: success rate0.2782407 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.99524092 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.01224028 of 138
pass: success rate0.30624011 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.62024093 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.3452406 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.20024010 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)1.7772402 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.320240137 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.53824012 of 138
points per trip inside the 401.6882403 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.17924092 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.117240104 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.06324075 of 138
opponent average starting field position75.300240124 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs