Miami (OH) · away
at
Final M-OH 14 – 59 PITT
Saturday 2026-09-05 12:30 · Acrisure Stadium
Pittsburgh · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
PITT pass rush5.6% 10758th11.2% 17924thfaces M-OH4.0% 10148th4.8% ~1.6 sacks
M-OH pass rush3.3% 123103rd4.8% 209137thfaces PITT4.0% 10147th3.6% ~1.2 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

M-OH with the ball

M-OH offence vs PITT defenceM-OH offencePITT defencerank gap
points added per play0.23943rd-0.10718th-25
success rate0.43082nd0.2872nd-80
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.42612th1.379119th+107
rush: points added per play0.017111th-0.17812th-99
rush: success rate0.389111th0.2787th-104
rush: explosiveness0.87792nd0.99592nd0
pass: points added per play0.6196th-0.01228th+22
pass: success rate0.48737th0.30611th-26
pass: explosiveness1.86711th1.62093rd+82
standard downs: success rate0.48874th0.3456th-68
passing downs: success rate0.30183rd0.20010th-73
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.871100th1.7772nd-98
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.212116th0.320137th+21
short-yardage conversion rate0.667104th0.53812th-92
points per trip inside the 403.90970th1.6883rd-67
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14979th0.17992nd+13
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111115th0.117104th-11
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03824th0.06375th+51
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.00063rd——

PITT with the ball

PITT offence vs M-OH defencePITT offenceM-OH defencerank gap
points added per play0.29425th0.179116th+91
success rate0.49726th0.450115th+89
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24960th1.316102nd+42
rush: points added per play0.07886th0.06583rd-3
rush: success rate0.46062nd0.42586th+24
rush: explosiveness0.809111th0.98591st-20
pass: points added per play0.50716th0.372123rd+107
pass: success rate0.53014th0.483125th+111
pass: explosiveness1.59558th1.52962nd+4
standard downs: success rate0.52840th0.509117th+77
passing downs: success rate0.41213th0.341116th+103
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.30939th2.86069th+30
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.18288th0.21798th+10
short-yardage conversion rate0.632115th0.778101st-14
points per trip inside the 404.23355th4.700129th+74
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.09613th0.1042nd-11
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05820th0.0659th-11
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03827th0.03813th-14
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.40073rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.