Hawai'i · away
at
Final HAW 27 – 37 STAN
Saturday 2026-08-29 19:00 · Stanford Stadium
Stanford · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
STAN pass rush2.6% 151116th9.0% 27863rdfaces HAW5.1% 19469th3.9% ~1.3 sacks
HAW pass rush3.5% 11596th6.3% 255120thfaces STAN3.3% 15335th3.4% ~1.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

HAW with the ball

HAW offence vs STAN defenceHAW offenceSTAN defencerank gap
points added per play0.042112th0.281133rd+21
success rate0.384117th0.458122nd+5
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.125116th1.377118th+2
rush: points added per play-0.008116th0.158119th+3
rush: success rate0.43385th0.458112th+27
rush: explosiveness0.86994th1.128124th+30
pass: points added per play0.117105th0.456132nd+27
pass: success rate0.373114th0.466116th+2
pass: explosiveness1.274131st1.59286th-45
standard downs: success rate0.439120th0.495107th-13
passing downs: success rate0.29189th0.383132nd+43
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13865th3.222116th+51
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17580th0.14519th-61
short-yardage conversion rate0.80038th0.812111th+73
points per trip inside the 403.190113th5.000132nd+19
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.168104th0.12820th-84
havoc allowed by the front seven0.108110th0.08036th-74
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06187th0.04940th-47
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.70023rd——

STAN with the ball

STAN offence vs HAW defenceSTAN offenceHAW defencerank gap
points added per play0.13080th0.213124th+44
success rate0.393112th0.466126th+14
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24961st1.22770th+9
rush: points added per play-0.002114th0.250131st+17
rush: success rate0.398105th0.490131st+26
rush: explosiveness0.796113th1.031102nd-11
pass: points added per play0.23074th0.13070th-4
pass: success rate0.386105th0.435103rd-2
pass: explosiveness1.60256th1.44747th-9
standard downs: success rate0.46496th0.526128th+32
passing downs: success rate0.253114th0.30695th-19
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.760115th3.437134th+19
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.212117th0.1103rd-114
short-yardage conversion rate0.76956th0.75083rd+27
points per trip inside the 403.261109th3.77398th-11
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12540th0.13430th-10
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07443rd0.07529th-14
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05163rd0.06065th+2
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.60013th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.