UCF · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-28 · time TBA · Folsom Field
Colorado · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
COLO pass rush5.6% 8957th15.7% 1983rdfaces UCF4.2% 7153rd4.9% ~1.6 sacks
UCF pass rush5.7% 12354th10.1% 21940thfaces COLO6.6% 10690th6.1% ~2.0 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UCF with the ball

UCF offence vs COLO defenceUCF offenceCOLO defencerank gap
points added per play0.11985th0.00754th-31
success rate0.43676th0.38261st-15
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20681st1.20762nd-19
rush: points added per play0.18046th-0.13520th-26
rush: success rate0.44574th0.41075th+1
rush: explosiveness1.16512th0.67512th0
pass: points added per play0.053113th0.22594th-19
pass: success rate0.42679th0.36539th-40
pass: explosiveness1.278130th1.830127th-3
standard downs: success rate0.49467th0.41542nd-25
passing downs: success rate0.29987th0.320107th+20
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.05280th2.37023rd-57
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17278th0.317136th+58
short-yardage conversion rate0.80041st0.64739th-2
points per trip inside the 404.76921st2.93544th+23
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13765th0.201118th+53
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09792nd0.138123rd+31
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04034th0.06478th+44
average starting field position (yards from own goal)63.200136th——

COLO with the ball

COLO offence vs UCF defenceCOLO offenceUCF defencerank gap
points added per play0.059104th-0.04732nd-72
success rate0.398110th0.34325th-85
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20285th1.27591st+6
rush: points added per play-0.019119th-0.11923rd-96
rush: success rate0.404101st0.30714th-87
rush: explosiveness0.852100th0.87250th-50
pass: points added per play0.113106th0.07756th-50
pass: success rate0.386104th0.38560th-44
pass: explosiveness1.60654th1.59587th+33
standard downs: success rate0.439119th0.40031st-88
passing downs: success rate0.31270th0.24839th-31
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13368th2.29113th-55
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14441st0.241114th+73
short-yardage conversion rate0.619117th0.62534th-83
points per trip inside the 402.217134th2.30414th-120
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.184126th0.17382nd-44
havoc allowed by the front seven0.122127th0.11192nd-35
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06185th0.06273rd-12
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10014th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.